Jury Service Done

The Gringo Viejo's jury service is done for this cycle.  There was nothing anyone can read about at the grocery check out line.  Very mundane service.   More tomorrow.

El Gringo Viejo

Anglican Curmudgeon: Quo vadimus?

Anglican Curmudgeon: Quo vadimus?: One has the greatest difficulty trying to climb into the mind of the bureaucrat(s) who decided to erect this sign . Far from being what ...

EL GRINGO VIEJO PUTS THIS INCLUSION IN FROM The Anglican Curmudgeon (season's colours mine).   It is required reading for OROGs.   Sour, sweet, bitter, and salty in one short article.   Brilliantly pointed and instructive.   90 second read.

El Gringo Viejo

Slight Changes

We shall be doing a bit of site modification and re-design.   Nothing major, but simply implementing notions that have come to us during the past few days.   Waiting around for the the jury selection process gives one a chance to think about things a bit, and that might be the source for this new inspiration.

      The process yesterday at the Courthouse was the quickest and best run yet experienced in perhaps fifteen or so journeys to the jury selection process.   El Gringo Viejo long ago stopped trying to avoid service.   Things like nice little old lady successfully sueing for damages after pouring hot coffee on herself are what motivates the Old Gringo's mean streak. 

       It is also difficult for normal people to understand or comprehend the crime wave we have in South Texas.   Incomprehensible, depraved zomboes with no souls  committing crimes that were unheard of down here back in the Flintstonian Epoch.    The product of unbridled breeding by the 666 people.    Parents (?) decapitating their three infant and toddler children as an offering to Santa Muerte so as to somehow gain access to more PCP, methamphetamine, or cocaine.

     It would be good to say that these are isolated insanities.   It is understood that such activity is not reserved to this area alone.   But, this is where the Old Gringo can do something about it.  In our presence in Mexico, we stand up for social order and the catechism of normality by demonstrating our support of the Army and Naval Infantry.....and just be being there.   Feeding the dogs and cats, tending the plants, providing a pleasant refuge and relaxation for visitors.  The locals are restored to know that people would journey from a distance to dwell among them.   Remember always, that Mexicans are always more appreciative of their own things when they are esteemed by foreigners and outsiders.    The locals may or may not like me, but they do like the fact that I like their setting....their place in geography, time, and situation.

     So, this feeds into El Gringo Viejo's view of things.   There are no radical changes coming to the web site or to the blog site.    Perhaps we are going to try to be a little less sharp edged, but oddly, we may slide a couple of clicks to the Right.   Standby, and thanks for your continued interest.

     We are fighting with the labyrinthine AdSense procedures in order to provide better shots at bargains for our readers and greater moolah for El Gringo Viejo.   Google, however, does not like the idea that we do not want porno ads, AARP ads, Planned Parenthood, Obama, United Nations, ACLU, and so forth.   We are not really into mobile abortion services or miltiple-state voter absentee registration forms.   Well....almost.

El Gringo Viejo

New Rules for GOP Candidate Encounters

The Republican National Committee must pass a new regulation concerning all future Republican campaigns for Primary Nomination as the Republican candidate for presentation in the general election next.    If not, we have learned nothing of our real difficulty during these days, and during the processes of this ongoing Presidential nomination process.

     From this time forward, any Republican Primary, regarding election to the position of United States House of Representatives, United States Senate, or for the Presidency or Vice-Presidency of the United States will be follow the following few and basic rules:

     (1)     All forums of discussion will be hosted by a group known to be a Republican entity.   A State Party, known Tea Party groupings, conservative think-tanks such as the Heritage Foundation, conservative publishing houses and commentary magazines, the Wall Street Journal, and the like would be qualified.   This writer would be inclined to include even the Log Cabin Republicans and certain conservative-oriented colleges and universities, such as Hillsdale College.    An approved list of host-sponsors for candidate forums must be established before the end of the year 2013.

     (2)     During the sessions...also known as debates....no candidate will be allowed to refer to any other candidate present and/or formally declared and legally registered as a candidate.

     (3)     Super PAC monies, operatives, and operations may only be deployed during general elections.   The avalanche of childish, churlish, half-truths and near slanderous bilge that the Republican candidates have thrown at each other  during these processes wreaks of rotting sewerage.   It appears as though the candidates and their teams are involved in some secret suicide pact.    Therefore, the Republican National Committee, in its wisdom and within its authority, issues this new set of regulations regarding the conduct of multi-candidate encounters, at any time or at any place.


It astounds this observer that we watch Republican candidates who have numerous good points hurl insults, variations of the truth, outright lies, and mud at one another, but with rare exception are reluctant to say anything remotely negative about a corrupt Chicago-style, marxist pretender who has ruled by the wave of his sceptre.

El Gringo Viejo has spoken.

Musings of a Friend and Musings on a Friend's Musings

Without too much brevity… Why not license a few more refineries and nuke plants?  How about pricing based on cost of production and refining instead of what the market can’t bear as in $10 a gallon however we can get it?  Actually, that really doesn’t matter because fossil fuels and oil companies are not the problem and destruction of America is the objective.

I have a 2005 diesel Mercedes with 265K miles and gets over 40 miles per gal with no fanfare.  If we (uh, err, Germans and Mexicans) can do that who needs alternative energy?  By the way, diesel requires less refining but costs more than any other liquid fuel. I guess that is because there is more demand for diesel and thereby crashing primarily commercial transportation system we can expedite the destruction. 

Personally, propane seems to be a really good alternative to liquid fuels however it is regulated by the railroad commission so ordinary users cannot easily acquire it for everyday consumption.  There is some reason for regulation of compressed natural gas as it boils at 32 degrees and is dangerous to transfer.  There is the “logic” for regulation by the RRC, compressed gas containers are considered boilers as in the old steam powered trains.  I am getting somewhat off track but not so much as this is an example of another government agency inhibiting the energy sector.

Good Blog!


   The above material is a comment derived from the pen of my best life-friend, a chum from junior high and high school and later life.   We caused a lot of turbulence for people, sometimes even intentionally.   He is a combat veteran, college graduate, advanced technician, among many other things.   He also frequently dishes up salient points that the Old Gringo either brays to0 loud to be heard, or did not think of on his own.
     We can gloat that we have a much older battle-wagon (1992) that we use for our transportation in Mexico.   Draws little attention.   Very serviceable.   But, the point is well taken.   In Mexico there are a million vehicles that are powered by propane.    There are very, very few safety issues resulting from this massive use.   The LPG and propane/butane alternative applications are there for the using, but even with that, more drilling is required.

     The conversion to diesel would also be a good idea.   It is cleaner and quieter and  very efficient.   Tinkering with some way to solve the volatility problem with natural gas should be considered a priority.

     Bang, bang, bang, and some rube in North Texas fires off three or four quick ideas that could all be developed....perhaps are being brought to applicable levels even now....all in private sector research and development....and some dumboe in South Texas sees the ideas, knows both intellectually and instinctively that the ideas are viable.....that adaptation processes, costs, and time-frames are all very "do-able".
     No need for Department of Energy nothin'.    No need for Solendra "alternative energy investments" by Father Obamaham.   No electric cars that are essentially coal burners and toys for high-income liberals.     It is just so obvious that the problem is the government, and the solution lies out here among the great unwashed.
     Bush did a lot of dumbo things and a number of good things.   Among the good things was his release of lands in lucrative off-shore areas and other prime spots during the last run-up on fuel costs.   While that in and of itself did not reduce the cost of fuel at the pump, it did break the back of the oil  commodity and fuel speculators.   The price of crude began to drop as speculators and traders began to abandon their "long positions"  for in oil futures.    Before a year had transpired, oil dropped from 150/barrel to 77/barrel (more or less, depending on origins/destinations of product).
     Any good conspiratorialist would almost be forced to believe that Obama and Soros conspired to send a research submarine down below to sabotage the deep water rig in the northern Gulf of Mexico.    Obama and all those around him favour European-level fuel costs. Each step taken since the Blow-out underscores the marxist axiom of ".....never let a good crisis go to waste...".   Even after being ordered by several and various levels of federal judges, Obama and his government continue to obstruct  previously legal and permitted activity in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere.

     We managed to convert from coal-oil lamps to gas lamps and  then electric lamps without Obama-like government "investment in the future".      We managed to move from wooden-spoked, iron-rimmed wagon wheels to rim-t0-wheel rubber tyres without "government leadership and investment".      There was no need to resuscitate the coal-oil lamp industry, and Conestoga went its way.   Folks can still find the lamps and wagon wheels, but the demand is not what it used to be.

     My chum's ramblings are stunningly simple, stunningly enlightened and would solve about 99.9% of the "energy problem"  that has no "silver bullet".   So, sorry Father Obamaham, as you see, there are three or four silver bullets that can and will make the North American Continent a self-contained and sufficient multiple-energy source market.    That market will be profitable for the producers, a permanent and massive fountain of high-skill blue-collar employment, and a source of power for production of wealth for all levels of American society.

FREE KEYSTONE NOW.
El Gringo Viejo

Algae, O'Reilly, & O'bama

Kudos to Dr. Krauthammer for having put O'Reilly in his place concerning the oil and gas issue.  On Thursday last's Factor, Bill O'Reilly put the world straight with his blowhard logic about how to "put the oil companies straight".    He was demanding that Father O'bamaham bring the evil oil company heads into the oval office and demand that they reduce the price of gasoline.   He ordered Father O'bamahan order an end to the practise of sending American refined gasoline to foreign countries.   He reminded Father O'bamaham that the sub-surface resources in the United States belonged to the "American People"  (This land is your land, this land is my land....) and that the oil companies had no right to make any profit off of the recovery and processing of such resources without the President's permission.

Algae, anyone?

 Here is an algae farm where we can put a tidal
generator basin and 20,000 of those beautiful wind
turbines, and maybe a couple of million Solendra
panels.   Any 500 billion dollars will do, if the rich would
just pay their fair share.

     Braying jackasses always have the answer about to  whom fault is to be assigned.  In O'Reilly's case, the fault for anything that is out of whack or not to his liking, is whoever he blames.    Pardon the "racism" but O'Reilly, as has been said on this blog on various occasions, is the drunk Irishman at the end of the bar whose idea of winning an argument is to out-shout the insignificant mates to whom he has deigned permission to have their lowly elbows on the bar and their insignificant boots on the brass rail beneath.   Krauthammer told O'Reilly in very certain terms that things about subsurface resource recovery are, most definitly handled by contract and not by order from a monarch or dictator.   He also pointed out that Obama has gone out of his way to hamstring production of energy material during his entire presidency.

Algae?    Algae?    And Obama thinks that this is even a new concept.   Arrogant sophist.

      O'Reilly knows nothing about Mexico, but since he has been there a few times, and because he has an opinion about it, he knows everything about Mexico.    Likewise, he knows nothing about oil or gas production and less about refining, transporting, futures trading, or the engineering matters involved with the industry, so therefore he considers himself to be a complete authority on the issue.

     Try to have O'Reilly deal with a simple, direct restatement of factual information, before going on the air, such as the following entry:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

".......For instance, take a look at what Jason Furman, one of the president’s advisers, said on a conference call with reporters just last week:

“Big oil companies actually pay lower tax rates on their profits than do most other corporations,” he said. “Get rid of those tax breaks so the big oil companies are being treated just the same as every other corporation when it comes to taxes.”

       This simply isn’t true, and I challenge reporters who hear these statements to take a look at the facts before they print such sweeping assertions.

• A Compustat North American Database analysis shows that the 2009 income tax rate for U.S. oil and gas companies was about 48 percent, which was 20 points higher than the rest of the Standard and Poor Industrials.
• According to the government’s own Energy Information Administration, from 2004 to 2008, 27 American oil and gas companies – which actually make up under half the total oil and gas production in the U.S. – paid almost $150 billion in U.S. income taxes.
• Additionally, those companies paid other non-income taxes of more than $300 billion, for a total U.S. tax contribution to federal, state, and local governments of more than $450 billion.
• Keep in mind, too, that Sec. 199 – the manufacturing and production tax provision that Furman would likely call a “tax break” for “big oil” – actually benefits other industries more than it does oil and gas companies.
• What’s almost more disturbing, however, is the context in which Mr. Furman made this remark. The Administration needs money to fund a proposed $50 billion stimulus package. To pay for it, the Administration is singling out the U.S. oil and natural gas industry for tax hikes, and making statements that lead people to conclude that oil and gas companies aren’t paying their fair share.
       The numbers above are proof that we pay more than our fair share."
  
  (excerpted from Pespectives, which is an EXXON-Mobil publication and blog concerning serious issues affecting the oil and natural gas industry.    The author is cited below.   The statistics he has included in the above excerpt have been verified by the Gringo Viejo.

About the author

Ken Cohen is vice president of public and government affairs for Exxon Mobil Corporation. He has worldwide responsibility for the company’s public policy, government relations, communications, media relations and corporate citizenship activities.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     Pro-communists, National Socialists, and other ''populists" who would rather trust in a weasel like Gietner or Soros or Obama or Hugo Chavez than in something like established, real and true facts talk like Bill O'Reilly.   The oil companies are accused, for instance, on a nightly basis of receiving "subsidies"....O'Reilly himself says the oil companies receive "subsidies".   When socialists and demagogs use that term against any opponent, they are almost always referring to a preferential exclusion from taxation.   Thinking along those lines, Save the Whales and the Salvation Army are receiving a "subsidy" from the IRS. The entire housing industry receives a subsidy because people write-off their interest payments on mortgages.

      However, when Father O'bamaham is cancelling out the preferred and other shares of stock and the bonds held by literally millions of small, medium, and large investors in what is now Government/UAW Motors and FIAT/UAW Motors  and shovelling scores of billions of United States Treasury assets into a black hole known as the Solendra - VOLT that is a good thing known as "investment".   (with someone else's money)

O'Reilly says that he cannot understand why Father O'bamaham does not understand this or that policy is injurious to America....why he does not understand that Keystone Pipeline is good for America....why he does not explain that America's number one oil supplier is ...America?    Why he  does not understand that the number two and three suppliers are Canada and Mexico almost always?    If we were to have three gasoline blends, and reasonable production access and rules for production and processing of oil, natural gas, and coal then the companies would make about as much money and the people would pay half of what they are paying now.    And, 98% of the supplies would be drawn from the North American Continent.

    And the Gringo Viejo repeats, as always.    Social Security is better than the Texas Retirement System because Social Security can makes slaves of old, mean, selfish geezers who hate the children who are not paying in enough.   Social Security is, was, and always will be a system designed to destroy America.   The Texas Retirement System is for people who take care of themselves and who kinda like babies and younger people and do not want them to pay for all the geezers.

     Likewise, Father Obamaham wants to drive up the cost of fuel to 10 dollars per gallon or more if possible.    He wants to destroy American Industry and the independent classes.   He wants to destroy America.   One destroys a nation by making the people dependent upon the government for food, housing, medical services, and transporation.   He wants to destroy America.

Chant after me...Free Money! Free Money!  Make the Rich pay!  Free Money!   There you go, I think we're getting the swing of it.

El Gringo Viejo