ON GUN CONTROL
AND THE CONSTITUTION:
There is not
much that can be said about the anti-gun movement that has not already been
said. As a citizen who is as terrified as any who do not understand how we have
lost so much to this tyranny all I can do is write… it is somewhat therapeutic.
Hopefully others will speak to any and all whose attention they attract to
emphasize, add to, or correct these rather simplistic thoughts.
There is
probably not anything that has been said that can obviate the ignorance of this
congregation of America hating, Constitution loathing, socialist, frightened,
mentally defective individuals who do not have the ability to comprehend the
harm they are doing to all Americans, and even to themselves.
The anti-gun
crowd is doing more damage to the country than all the perverted mass murderers
perpetrated on the population as far back in our history as has been recorded.
The C minus government that is leading the D minus apparent majority of the
population is "feeding the monkey" (as in "watch the monkey mess in his cage").
The Second
Amendment was written for all time. The right to keep and bear arms is for
“individual” protection and for individuals to participate in a “well regulated
militia” if and when needed. The militia is not specified as a government
entity. It is rather a militia of like minded individuals who would protect
themselves from tyranny by the government as well as any other threat by means
of arms if necessary. Written any other way, the Second would be meaningless to
the individual defense.
The Declaration
of Independence inspired the Articles of Confederation in respect to the right
to bear arms as is evident in the first paragraph:
|
The Lexington Minuteman
It is well to remember that in the colonies,
and then in the several States, the "militia"
was composed, normally, of all men between
and including the ages of 16 to 60, who were
not indentured, and who were free of court
bond or criminal judgement or conviction. |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary
for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes
which impel them to the separation.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
As a last
resort, of course, the stick is necessary as it was especially in the American
War for Independence as well as many subsequent foriegn wars.
Then, in the
first sentence of the Preamble to the Constitution, the phrase “We the people of
the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” means not only to
perfect the imperfections and tyranny of British rule but more to perfect the
ambiguities, defects, and disconnects in the Articles of Confederation. The
Bill of Rights clearly and simply establishes law under God in the order by
which it should be honored.
The
Constitution of the United States First guarantees specific freedoms of
individuals from government control. The First Amendment guarantees the freedom
of speech, press, association, religion, and petition of the government for a
redress of grievances etc
.
The Second
Amendment secondly guarantees individual rights to defend against violations of
the First Amendment by government as in “petition the government for a redress
of grievances” by arms as a last resort if it should, God forbid, escalate to
that.
We find
ourselves today in a position where we have a government trying to circumvent
the First Amendment by removing our last resort. They would disarm us by
distorting the meaning and intent of the Second Amendment.
If and when
that should happen, any people who would attempt to preserve their rights to
bear arms (and all individuals of the United States for that matter) will be
subjected to “unreasonable” search and seizure in violation of the Fourth
Amendment.
We have already
seen abuse of the commerce clause of the Seventeenth Amendment, and the taxing
authority of the Sixteenth Amendment to falsely justify the ObamaCare
Catastrophe. Both abuses would be constitutionally illegal if not
abrogated by a renegade progressive Supreme Court.
By Executive
orders, incompetent Federal judges, and our socialist congressional
representatives we are losing our freedom and rights. Our Constitution is being
deconstructed one amendment at a time.
The last
bulwark may be the Tenth Amendment or maybe not. If the States cannot or will
not take initiatives to turn this ship around the only course of action may be
secessions by the several states.
Getting down to
the most recent issue, gun control, we have a very serious situation that needs
immediate and forceful action by pro gun supporters. Call, write, talk, yell,
scream, or any other peaceful method available to reach those politicians who
have it in their power to stop the Feinstein freight train and other anti-gun
initiatives that degrade the Second Amendment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This writer has
many guns. Some are old surplus collectables, some are for target shooting, some
are for hunting, and some are for simply admiring. They are all potentially for
personal protection. Among the guns are pistols… revolvers and semiautomatic
ones.
Some are automatic shotguns, so-called. The shotguns are actually
semiautomatic ones, holding 5 shells at a time. Some are bolt action rifles that
will load only one round at a time. Once again, one pull of the trigger, one shot.
Some are of the “military looking” type
that accept magazines up to 30 rounds. They can hold larger magazines but that
is unusual for most gun owners. These last rifles are not different from
pistols which have a magazine with several rounds in that it takes, you guessed it, one pull of
the trigger for one shot to fire.
These
semiautomatic guns were not invented or sold to the public to harm anyone but to
make it easier and more convenient to shoot more rounds without having to go
through the motion of changing out a magazine. Technology made it possible and
technology cannot be denied.
The writer has one rifle (a Ruger Mini-14 .223
cal) that, at the time of the last weapons ban, would accommodate a 30 round
magazine which could be displayed in the rear window of a pickup truck in its
ranch style stock configuration; however, when equipped with its optional
folding type stock it was prohibited. There was absolutely no difference in the
function of the rifle, it just looked different.
These people
trying to take guns away from the citizenry are so uninformed as to think an
AR-15 is more dangerous than any other type rifle because “It’s scary looking”,
it looks kinda like what they see in the war movies. The AR-15, AK-47, HK, FN,
and all the other “military looking” rifles are great for personal defense but
not as suited for military purposes because they are not capable of selective
fire. They are not “machine guns” or “heavy weapons” (whatever heavy weapons
are, a term made up by a much uninformed Bill O’Reilly).
The guns that
are legal today have all the restrictions necessary and more than necessary for
the law abiding population. More laws are absurd and will not stop killing as
we have seen. A scenario that
comes to mind is that Adam Lanza could simply have made three or four pipe
bombs, walked down the hall of the school and tossed them into three or four
classrooms and be gone before anyone could have seen him. Those could have
been hidden in a jacket, much less visible than the guns he used. They possibly
could have quadrupled the deaths and casualties as were rendered with his
guns. Not having guns would not have prevented this sicko from killing
children!
If certain people are, or if a person is, so deranged, or predisposed, to murder there are many more ways to kill and harm than with
guns. The environments these killers are exposed to (pre-adolescent behaviour-modification drugs for hyperactivity, for instance) are the weapons, not the
guns. The sick minded will always be with us. The answer to the problem is not
so easy, however awareness and education are a better defense than more stupid
laws. There are presently over 19,000 specific laws controlling privately held firearms and ammunition on the books. The killers are insane but so are the laws, and groups pushing them, that
attempt to attach blame for the killings to these inanimate tools.
The
Constitution is a document inspired by God. Not unlike Jesus Christ, it is
being crucified.
The people of
the United States must do everything in their power, individually and
collectively, to protect this fundamental legal document from which all our
rights and liberty are documented. It does not now or ever need to be
“fundamentally changed”.
The tools that
would protect this document are provided for within it; however, it is up to the
beneficiaries of the Constitution to know what is in it and what it means. It
was intentionally made simple for all to understand. The laws that are added to
it only confuse, contradict, and compound the issues and multiply the problems.
We don't have to pass the this 6 page
document (not 2,200 plus) to know what is in it. It has already been
passed!
El Zorro
(who also operates under the alias of James Robert Hathorn, Texan - with Cherokee overtones, self-reliant, professional, self-employed, semi-retired, veteran of Viet Nam War [two tours]. Typical stereotypical rube who clings to his guns, religious and philospophical notions, who can break down and fix a computer and put it back together...and is more well-read and studied on issues of history, culture, firearm mechanics - physics - and- law, Constitutional issues, and precedents than any of the babblers in the Obsolete Press Choir. He is a collegiate, and Southern gentleman and a patriot. He is El Gringo Viejo's go-to on all the above matters, plus many others...and is also a life friend since early days at Mirabeau Bonapart Lamar Junior High School in McAllen, Texas late in the decade known as The Fifties)
|