Sunday, 6 January 2013

Guns, Guns, Guns, and Idiocy (with addenda added, 21:45 6 June 2013)

    When El Gringo Viejo was in high school, it is his best estimate that 25 to 30 percent of all the autos parked in the high school's parking lot had firearms in the glove compartment or the trunk.  This was especially true during the various hunting seasons.
     In many areas, and especially in Central Texas, East Texas, The Panhandle, and actually almost all of the rural and suburban parts of Texas it was common...nay, see every other pickup truck equipped with a "head banger"...a term used for an in-cab rifle rack.
Folks would put their favourite ready-to-use rifle in one bracket and perhaps a nice .410 /.22 magnum over/under shotgun/rifle in the other bracket.
     In those years, carrying a pistol around in the auto was not permitted.  Carrying a pistol around on a person's person was not permitted, concealed or exposed.  But a person could lug a double-barrel 12 gauge shotgun into a skating rink full of pre-teens, or into a bowling alley, and there would scant attention paid to the event.
     That rather much flies in the face of the Roy Rogers and Hollywood image of Texas;  no pistols, no fast-draw events on main street during a dispute at the Tom Green County Fair with hearses lined up at Boot Hill every afternoon waiting to disgorge perforated cowboys by the score.   But, Texas law was a funny thing.   District Attorneys were wont to bring charges before a grand jury...and even more so a court-seated jury...that would result in no conviction.  Juries would predictably say among themselves, "A feller needs to be able to defend himself if he's in a strange stretch of country.  He doesn't know the Sheriff or the cops, so he might need to take matters into his own hands."
      And so, it became the normally accepted practise that a "Bona fide traveller" could carry a pistol in his auto (mount).   To be such a person, one had to be clear of criminal record, travelling across county lines, intending to stay overnight away from his homestead or normal place of abode.  A suitcase with clean underwear and a toothbrush and a razor, with attendant shaving mug and brush and toothpaste would help.
     Of course, no one locked up.  Most vehicles...even most houses...were left unlocked overnight.   And we had no killings, shootings, or even brandishing with the firearms during all my days in public schools, in McAllen, Texas.   Not much, if any, all over Texas, as I recall.   There were three major differences between then and now.
 (1)    99.8% of all of the people had a CATECHISM.   There were social complexes involving the Masons, the Protestants, the Jews, the Catholics, the agnostics, the gnostics and almost everyone that recognised and understood morality, ethics, and conscience.

(2)   Every fourth male from the 2nd grade on, WAS NOT on behaviour modification drugs to "cure and control"  ADDBEGGE and BBED and RNUDDW and ZZZSA)RRR - type III, and  Quakflapper's Syndrome.
 (3)   Then, there were almost no multigenerational participants in public assistance.   No gangs, no real "underworld", save for mafia sub-groups in the biggest cities...Houston, Dallas, San Antonio.   There was no abundance of fatherless, or no adult male in house,

Charles Whitman -  said to have been an Eagle Scout, although
the rumours in Austin, Texas at the time was that his father had
"bullied" the scout-master of the troop into giving Whitman passing
marks in his qualifications.   Whitman was also a Marine, and
a highly trained sniper.   He was not a very good student at the
University of Texas.
     It all stopped one day, on the 1st of August,1966.   With Charles Whitman.  The University of Texas Tower shooter.   He had been medicated for several years for "adolescent hyperactivity".  Then one day he stabbed and shot his mother in her sleep, then went home and did the same to his wife, and then went to the UT Tower, killed 13 more, and wounded 30.   One shot was almost 3/4ths of a mile.   He also had a walnut sized tumour on the right side, rear part of his brain.  Sears and Roebuck solved all the problems after that shooting by stopping the sale of pistols.   No pistols were used by Charles Whitman in the Tower shootings.   Makes sense in Estrogenese, perhaps.
    Then the central government said that we couldn't buy rifles by mail-order any more.  That also solved all the problems, forever, again.  That law was first enacted in 1962 after the Kennedy assassination, then "strenthened'' in 1967.   The ATF was expanded both in bureaucratic size and in the scope its duties.   That also stopped all crime, forever.....again.   Especially gun crime.
      As days and times came and went, there was a steady, almost geometric, increase in crimes such of ethnic gang shootings, drive-by shootings, drug-trade and territory shootings, and the spontaneous mass shootings without specific intended victims or motive.  In Texas we had, stunningly, the Temple, Texas Luby's Cafeteria shooting.   Of course, we cannot count the Mr. Carmel murders of fifty or more low-class, low-intelligence religious kooks because that was official business, and its okay for the ATF and FBI to kill people when they think it is necessary.
     More gun-crime later, and much demagoguery by the Clinton administration.."cop-killer bullets",  "semi-automatics", "assault weapons"...all became part of the lexicon.   Women trudging down, acting as if their losses were more important than anyone elses losses, demanding the end of gun ownership, gun shows, guns, and gun retailers, and anything that goes "bang" or "boom".
      It is an approved method of eliminating un-preferred associates, friends, wives, enemies, unknown people, etc. by the employment of bludgeoning devices such as skillets, baseball bats, hammers, mountain climbing picks, front or rear end of an automobile, or samurai sable.    Various poisons remain legally employable for the purpose, as well as manoeuvres such as cutting brake lines, pushing off cliffs, out of 6th floor windows, or throwing the electric space heater into the bathtub while intended victim is bathing.    For a complete list of approved methods and procedures, please write .
     The estrogenophiles are particularly disturbed with "semi-automatic" guns.   They apparently do not know what a semi-automatic firearm is, but they are certain that being semi-automatic makes them worse than a hammer.   They are also deathly afraid of what the Obsolete Media has branded as "assault weapons" .
        Once again; REALITY TO PLANET EARTH,  semi-automatic means one pull of the trigger - one shot....and ALL WEAPONS ARE ASSAULT WEAPONS.   A J.C. Higgins 9-shot, .22 revolver, w/ 9 inch barrel target pistol....IS AN ASSAULT WEAPON!!!!   An assault weapon is a weapon that is used in an assault.   And, of course, any bullet that kills or wounds a cop is a "Cop-killer Bullet".   Sheeeesh!
Bad gun. bad, bad, bad.  Meany gun.
      Fienstein and the Hillaryistas....long noted for straight-thinking and honesty....also decided that it was worse to be shot at and/or hit by a bullet fired from a "mean-looking" gun than a "nice, kinder, and gentler looking gun.  That is a gun that looks really "masculine" and "mechanical" and "militaristic" and "meany-poo".  This is because bullets fired by "mean-looking" guns are a lot meaner, and insensitive to the interests of women's issues, homosexuals, Native American Indian kleptomaniacs, Japanese-American hot-air balloon operators, and middle-sized city bus drivers, and manicurists who have heterochromatic eyes.

     The problem is that criminals like the ones in Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, name the country...will find weapons that shoot and stab.  In Norway, very recently, a Nordoe killed about 60 Muslims because they offended him for having been born.  Almost all were young people with long lives awaiting them.  Norway has draconian gun laws.   Following Hillarythink...all those children are still alive.   No one in Norway can have or hold a gun unless he is escorted by 300 pre-grief counsellors, a great-grandmother, two Romanian Orthodox priests, a chef, nine chimney sweeps, and a left handed beautician.  In Mexico, a person can obtain a pistol permit for his house...just by going to Mexico City and standing in line for 326 years and six months (not quite that bad).
     In the British Isles, everything is perfect.  They don't have gun crime...and the resultant murders...right?   Well, not so fast.  They have quite a bit of gun crime now, with the Commonwealth people having flooded into England with their British passports in hand.  Pilfering, burglary, home invasions, rape, assault, car-jacking, etc. is all much, much worse than Texas...where almost all the innocent and law abiding are either armed or thought to be armed.   Our overall crime rate, including murder,  WENT DOWN SHARPLY after concealed carry became the law of the Republic of Texas.
     Texas or Detroit?         Texas is safer.
     Texas or Chicago?       Texas is safer.
     Texas or D.C.                 Texas is safer.
     Texas or anywhere?   Texas is safer.

THE ENTIRE PROBLEM CANNOT BE RESOLVED, only portions.   Only portions can be diminished.  There will always be evil.  There will always be wickedness.  Satan moves the mind and heart of man in bad ways.   Laws cannot prevent bad acts by people with defective souls or ill intent.  If not a firearm, a knife.  If not a knife, strychnine.  If not poison, then a bomb.  And so on.
     The biggest problem that El Gringo Viejo sees is the practise of loading up juvenile and adolescent males who are a bit hyper with drugs that dull their senses and turn them inward.  The mindless pursuit of meaningless scores and levels in a set of ultra-violent computer games becomes their understanding of reality.  One never seems to hear of them being involved with the church or synagogue, or being the the High School Marching/Symphony Band, or the debate club, or playing a good shortstop on the American Legion team.   Not even the cowardly thug of Fort Hood fame had much beyond a poor medical practise record and a consumptive obsession with death.
     If we could solve that problem, then there could be a bit of progress on the issue.   It will do nothing to address the 512 killings in Chicagoland,  where no guns are permitted, essentially.   It does nothing about the rack-up of a hundred there and two hundred here, in towns like New Orleans, Gary, Detroit, Philadelphia, Oakland, Phoenix, etc.  The inner-city killings are because life there has no value.  The spree killers kill because they know the people they are killing have value to someone....a value they have not felt for a long time, because they have been too drugged up, and too habitualised to violent outcomes by their Chop Her Head Off and Throw It in the Woodchipper games.
Thanks for your time and attention.  More later.
El Gringo Viejo


 We add the following co-related set of thoughts.   Credit is given the author, David Kupelian who has specialised in the pointing out of the purposeful holes left in the reporting of events by the Obsolete Media.

The giant, gaping hole in Sandy Hook reporting

‎Today, ‎January ‎06, ‎2013, ‏‎7 hours ago | David KupelianGo to full article

Since last month’s horrifying and heartbreaking school massacre in Newtown, Conn., politicians and the press have, as everyone knows, been totally obsessed with firearms.
Indeed, President Obama has vowed to impose strong new gun-control measures on the nation – very soon, with or without Congress.
Other possible factors – from violent video games to the “failure of our mental-health system” to the unintended consequences of making schools “gun-free zones” – have taken a back seat to guns. Within hours of the gruesome mega-crime, the media had provided extensive, round-the-clock coverage of precisely which firearms, manufacturers and calibers the perpetrator had used, how he had obtained them from his mother, where they were originally purchased, and so on.
But where, I’d like to ask my colleagues in the media, is the reporting about the psychiatric medications the perpetrator – who had been under treatment for mental-health problems – may have been taking? After all, Mark and Louise Tambascio, family friends of the shooter and his mother, were interviewed on CBS’ “60 Minutes,” during which Louise Tambascio told correspondent Scott Pelley: “I know he was on medication and everything, but she homeschooled him at home cause he couldn’t deal with the school classes sometimes, so she just homeschooled Adam at home. And that was her life.” And here, Tambascio tells ABC News, “I knew he was on medication, but that’s all I know.”
It has been more than three weeks since the shooting. We know all about the guns he used, but what “medication” may he have used? (One brief mini-hoax emerged when the New York Daily News published a story claiming the shooter, according to his uncle, had been on the controversial antipsychotic drug Fanapt. That story was quickly withdrawn after the “uncle” turned out to be a fraudster with no relation to the murderer.)
So, what is the truth? Where is the journalistic curiosity? Where is the follow-up? Where is the police report, the medical examiner’s report, the interviews with his doctor and others?
Get autographed copies of both of David Kupelian’s classics: “The Marketing of Evil” and “How Evil Works.”
But let me back up. Perhaps you’re wondering why this issue of psychiatric medications should be so important.
As I documented in “How Evil Works,” it is simply indisputable that most perpetrators of school shootings and similar mass murders in our modern era were either on – or just recently coming off of – psychiatric medications:
  • Columbine mass-killer Eric Harris was taking Luvox – like Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Effexor and many others, a modern and widely prescribed type of antidepressant drug called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. Harris and fellow student Dylan Klebold went on a hellish school shooting rampage in 1999 during which they killed 12 students and a teacher and wounded 24 others before turning their guns on themselves.Luvox manufacturer Solvay Pharmaceuticals concedes that during short-term controlled clinical trials, 4 percent of children and youth taking Luvox – that’s 1 in 25 – developed mania, a dangerous and violence-prone mental derangement characterized by extreme excitement and delusion.
  • Patrick Purdy went on a schoolyard shooting rampage in Stockton, Calif., in 1989, which became the catalyst for the original legislative frenzy to ban “semiautomatic assault weapons” in California and the nation. The 25-year-old Purdy, who murdered five children and wounded 30, had been on Amitriptyline, an antidepressant, as well as the antipsychotic drug Thorazine.
  • Kip Kinkel, 15, murdered his parents in 1998 and the next day went to his school, Thurston High in Springfield, Ore., and opened fire on his classmates, killing two and wounding 22 others. He had been prescribed both Prozac and Ritalin.
  • In 1988, 31-year-old Laurie Dann went on a shooting rampage in a second-grade classroom in Winnetka, Ill., killing one child and wounding six. She had been taking the antidepressant Anafranil as well as Lithium, long used to treat mania.
  • In Paducah, Ky., in late 1997, 14-year-old Michael Carneal, son of a prominent attorney, traveled to Heath High School and started shooting students in a prayer meeting taking place in the school’s lobby, killing three and leaving another paralyzed. Carneal reportedly was on Ritalin.
  • In 2005, 16-year-old Native American Jeff Weise, living on Minnesota’s Red Lake Indian Reservation, shot and killed nine people and wounded five others before killing himself. Weise had been taking Prozac.
  • In another famous case, 47-year-old Joseph T. Wesbecker, just a month after he began taking Prozac in 1989, shot 20 workers at Standard Gravure Corp. in Louisville, Ky., killing nine. Prozac-maker Eli Lilly later settled a lawsuit brought by survivors.
  • Kurt Danysh, 18, shot his own father to death in 1996, a little more than two weeks after starting on Prozac. Danysh’s description of own his mental-emotional state at the time of the murder is chilling: “I didn’t realize I did it until after it was done,” Danysh said. “This might sound weird, but it felt like I had no control of what I was doing, like I was left there just holding a gun.”
  • John Hinckley, age 25, took four Valium two hours before shooting and almost killing President Ronald Reagan in 1981. In the assassination attempt, Hinckley also wounded press secretary James Brady, Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy and policeman Thomas Delahanty.
  • Andrea Yates, in one of the most heartrending crimes in modern history, drowned all five of her children – aged 7 years down to 6 months – in a bathtub. Insisting inner voices commanded her to kill her children, she had become increasingly psychotic over the course of several years. At her 2006 murder re-trial (after a 2002 guilty verdict was overturned on appeal), Yates’ longtime friend Debbie Holmes testified: “She asked me if I thought Satan could read her mind and if I believed in demon possession.” And Dr. George Ringholz, after evaluating Yates for two days, recounted an experience she had after the birth of her first child: “What she described was feeling a presence … Satan … telling her to take a knife and stab her son Noah,” Ringholz said, adding that Yates’ delusion at the time of the bathtub murders was not only that she had to kill her children to save them, but that Satan had entered her and that she had to be executed in order to kill Satan.Yates had been taking the antidepressant Effexor. In November 2005, more than four years after Yates drowned her children, Effexor manufacturer Wyeth Pharmaceuticals quietly added “homicidal ideation” to the drug’s list of “rare adverse events.” The Medical Accountability Network, a private nonprofit focused on medical ethics issues, publicly criticized Wyeth, saying Effexor’s “homicidal ideation” risk wasn’t well-publicized and that Wyeth failed to send letters to doctors or issue warning labels announcing the change.And what exactly does “rare” mean in the phrase “rare adverse events”? The FDA defines it as occurring in less than one in 1,000 people. But since that same year 19.2 million prescriptions for Effexor were filled in the U.S., statistically that means thousands of Americans might experience “homicidal ideation” – murderous thoughts – as a result of taking just this one brand of antidepressant drug.Effexor is Wyeth’s best-selling drug, by the way, which in one recent year brought in over $3 billion in sales, accounting for almost a fifth of the company’s annual revenues.
  • One more case is instructive, that of 12-year-old Christopher Pittman, who struggled in court to explain why he murdered his grandparents, who had provided the only love and stability he’d ever known in his turbulent life. “When I was lying in my bed that night,” he testified, “I couldn’t sleep because my voice in my head kept echoing through my mind telling me to kill them.” Christopher had been angry with his grandfather, who had disciplined him earlier that day for hurting another student during a fight on the school bus. So later that night, he shot both of his grandparents in the head with a .410 shotgun as they slept and then burned down their South Carolina home, where he had lived with them.”I got up, got the gun, and I went upstairs and I pulled the trigger,” he recalled. “Through the whole thing, it was like watching your favorite TV show. You know what is going to happen, but you can’t do anything to stop it.”Pittman’s lawyers would later argue that the boy had been a victim of “involuntary intoxication,” since his doctors had him taking the antidepressants Paxil and Zoloft just prior to the murders.Paxil’s known “adverse drug reactions” – according to the drug’s FDA-approved label – include “mania,” “insomnia,” “anxiety,” “agitation,” “confusion,” “amnesia,” “depression,” “paranoid reaction,” “psychosis,” “hostility,” “delirium,” “hallucinations,” “abnormal thinking,” “depersonalization” and “lack of emotion,” among others.The preceding examples are only a few of the best-known offenders who had been taking prescribed psychiatric drugs before committing their violent crimes – there are many others. Whether we like to admit it or not, it is undeniable that when certain people living on the edge of sanity take psychiatric medications, those drugs can – and occasionally do – push them over the edge into violent madness. Remember, every single SSRI antidepressant sold in the United States of America today, no matter what brand or manufacturer, bears a “black box” FDA warning label – the government’s most serious drug warning – of “increased risks of suicidal thinking and behavior, known as suicidality, in young adults ages 18 to 24.” Common sense tells us that where there are suicidal thoughts – especially in a very, very angry person – homicidal thoughts may not be far behind. Indeed, the mass shooters we are describing often take their own lives when the police show up, having planned their suicide ahead of time.
    So, what ‘medication’ was Lanza on?
    The Sandy Hook school massacre, we are constantly reminded, was the “second-worst school shooting in U.S. history.” Let’s briefly revisit the worst, Virginia Tech, because it provides an important lesson for us. One would think, in light of the stunning correlation between psych meds and mass murders, that it would be considered critical to establish definitively whether the Virginia Tech murderer of 32 people, student Cho Seung-Hui, had been taking psychiatric drugs.
    Yet, more than five years later, the answer to that question remains a mystery.
    Even though initially
    the New York Times reported, “officials said prescription medications related to the treatment of psychological problems had been found among Mr. Cho’s effects,” and the killer’s roommate, Joseph Aust, had told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that Cho’s routine each morning had included taking prescription drugs, the state’s toxicology report released two months later said “no prescription drugs or toxic substances were found in Cho Seung-Hui.”
    Perhaps so, but one of the most notoriously unstable and unpredictable times for users of SSRI antidepressants is the period shortly after they’ve stopped taking them, during which time the substance may not be detectable in the body.
    What kind of meds might Cho have been taking – or recently have stopped taking? Curiously, despite an
    exhaustive investigation by the Commonwealth of Virginia which disclosed that Cho had taken Paxil for a year in 1999, specifics on what meds he was taking prior to the Virginia Tech massacre have remained elusive. The final 20,000-word report manages to omit any conclusive information about the all-important issue of Cho’s medications during the period of the mass shooting.
    To add to the drama, it wasn’t until two years after the state’s in-depth report was issued that, as disclosed in an Aug. 19, 2009,
    ABC News report, some of Cho’s long-missing mental health records were located:
    The records released today were discovered to be missing during a Virginia panel’s August 2007 investigation four-and-a-half months after the massacre.
    The notes were recovered last month from the home of Dr. Robert Miller, the former director of the counseling center, who says he inadvertently packed Cho’s file into boxes of personal belongings when he left the center in February 2006. Until the July 2009 discovery of the documents, Miller said he had no idea he had the records.
    Miller has since been let go from the university.
    Although Cho’s newly discovered mental-health files reportedly revealed nothing further about his medications, the issues raised by the initial accounts – including the “officials” cited by the New York Times and the Richmond paper’s eyewitness account of daily meds-taking – remain unaddressed to this day.
    Some critics suggest these official omissions are motivated by a desire to protect the drug companies from ruinous product liability claims. Indeed, pharmaceutical manufacturers are nervous about lawsuits over the “rare adverse effects” of their mood-altering medications. To avoid costly settlements and public relations catastrophes – such as when GlaxoSmithKline was ordered to pay $6.4 million to the family of 60-year-old Donald Schnell who murdered his wife, daughter and granddaughter in a fit of rage shortly after starting on Paxil – drug companies’ legal teams have quietly and skillfully settled hundreds of cases out-of-court, shelling out hundreds of millions of dollars to plaintiffs. Pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly fought scores of legal claims against Prozac in this way, settling for cash before the complaint could go to court while stipulating that the settlement remain secret – and then claiming it had never lost a Prozac lawsuit.
    All of which is, once again, to respectfully but urgently ask the question: When on earth are we going to find out if the perpetrator of the Sandy Hook school massacre, like so many other mass shooters, had been taking psychiatric drugs?
    In the end, it may well turn out that knowing what kinds of guns he used isn’t nearly as important as what kind of drugs he used.
    That is, assuming we ever find out.
  • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~