Monday, 3 August 2015

The Arrogant Drift of Social Analysis....it is always someone else's fault....

A note to the OROG community:

     What follows in blue is official analysis and explanation from a government and public publication.   What is printed in blue is the undisturbed official line.  There was so much that was wrong and/ or conjectural that critique of the entire passage was nigh unto impossible.  We made a few snide, but pertinent observations, leaving to rest various things that could have been said about the Closner and Baker people, and more.   But what is written in the reddish colour is our imbedded remarks and snarkiness, like that jerk in the movie house who critiques the movie while it is being shown.  

HIDALGO COUNTY.
Hidalgo County (T-16), in South Texas, is bordered by Cameron County on the east, Brooks County on the north, Starr County on the west, and Mexico on the south. The county seat, Edinburg, is at the junction of U.S. highways 107 and 281. The center point of the county is at 26°23' north latitude and 98°10' west longitude. Other communities of note in Hidalgo County are McAllen, Weslaco, Mission, Peñitas, and San Juan. Hidalgo County comprises 1,596 square miles of the Rio Grande delta. Its elevations range from forty to 200 feet. The northern part of the county has sandy and light loamy soils over deep reddish or mottled, clayey subsoils. In some areas limestone lies within forty inches of the surface. The southern part of the county has moderately deep to deep loamy surfaces over clayey subsoils. Along the Rio Grande brown to red clays occur. Hidalgo County is in the South Texas Plains vegetation area, which features grasses, mesquite, live oaks, and chaparral. Native plants, reduced in recent years by extensive farming, include chapote, guayacan, ebony, huisache, Brazilwood, and yucca. In 1982, 91 percent of the land was in farms and ranches, with 52 percent of the farmland under cultivation and 85 percent irrigated; 51 to 60 percent of the county was considered prime farmland. The primary crops were sorghum, cotton, corn, and vegetables; Hidalgo County led Texas counties in the production of cabbage, onions, cantaloupes, carrots, and watermelons. The primary fruits and nuts grown in the county were grapefruit, oranges, and pecans. Cattle, milk cows, and hogs were the primary livestock products. Natural resources included caliche, sand, gravel, oil, and gas. Oil and gas production in 1982 totaled 98,487,211,000 cubic feet of gas-well gas, 139,995 barrels of crude oil, 1,101,666 barrels of condensate, and 15,784,000 cubic feet of casinghead gas. The climate is subtropical and subhumid. Temperatures range from an average low of 47° F in January to an average high to 96° in July; the average annual temperature is 73°. Rainfall averages twenty-three inches a year, and the growing season lasts for 320 days of the year.
Indians have called the area home for 11,000 years. Artifacts dating to the Archaic Period indicate that inhabitants of the region were hunters and gatherers who practised no agriculture and kept no domestic animals except a few dogs. Subsequently, some forms of agriculture, such as raising maize, were introduced. Several major linguistic groups called the lower Rio Grande valley home, including Coahuilteco and Karankawa. The Coahuiltecans in the future county hunted a wide variety of animals, fished, gathered berries, fruits, and roots, and used mountain laurel for its narcotic No backbone?  effects. The Lipan Apaches, having been forced out of Colorado and New Mexico by the Comanches, entered Texas in the 1700s and gained control of South Texas by 1775. The Comanches followed them and arrived in South Texas in the early nineteenth century.   (Much of this paragraph seems to be lifted from another write up about some insignificant place in the middle of Whocarezia, that is used for filler for tourist pamphlets.   The fact is that the Spaniards named places after what the Nahua {Aztecs) had named them.  The Nahua (Aztecs) named them after what the previous whatever speakers called  them.  In what is now northern Mexico, the Aztecs encountered people they referred  to as the  Chichimeca....or the jibber-jabber people.   Therefore, the Spanish had the opportunity to name this cluster of naked live-lizard eaters {organic?} the Come Crudos {raw-eaters}, and others the 'Tejas' {people who use leaves of maguey to cover their hovels, looking much like the tejas used as roofing in Italy, Spain, Portugal, and the western islands}. Further it is not certain that the Comanches' first dominance in southernmost Texas was during that one period that we, as white men, know.).
     Some historians surmise that Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca traveled through the area after his 1528 shipwreck. In August 1638 Jacinto García de Sepulveda crossed the Rio Grande into the area at the site of Mier in search of Dutch sailors reported on the Texas coast. In 1687 the second expedition of Alonso De León in search of Fort St. Louis also followed the river route. In 1747 Miguel de la Garza Falcón reconnoitered the northern bank of the river in search of suitable land to establish a settlement. He found the land unsuitable even for stock raising and condemned it as uninhabitable. Despite his judgment, the area again drew the attention of the Spanish crown.
     In 1749 José de Escandón was assigned the task of colonizing the area.  (It must be noted here that the Captain cited above, Miquel de la Garza Falcon, when he did his investigation above-described, was under the command and order of Jose de Escandon.   Escandon established the communities named below, along with almost a score more, throughout the area that would be later known as Tamaulipas State....the word tamaulipas meaning place of extensive grasses in the Chichimec and Huastec languages). He established four towns on the southern banks of the Rio Grande including Reynosa (1749), which was originally located across the river from the site of present-day Peñitas. He founded Camargo, Mier, and Revilla (now Guerrero) in 1749, 1750, and 1752 respectively. Settlers from these colonies later crossed the Rio Grande and settled the northern banks of the river. About eighty porciones in about nineteen grants were issued in the future Hidalgo County by the Spanish and Mexican governments. Colonization was left in the hands of the grantees, who established settlements along the river as well as in the northern reaches of the future county. A settlement called La Habitación, also known as Rancho San Luis or San Luisito (our understanding of the oldest name of the place was, Hacienda de San Luis or San Luisito, because the city in New Spain known as San Luis Potosi was already established as an ore processor and bullion stamper in the very centre of what is now Mexico, two hundred years earlier.) and pr, was established north of the river at the site of present-day Hidalgo, Texas, in 1774. Because the land was suitable for cattle and sheep raising the grantees turned to ranching with great success. Among the first settlers was Juan José Ynojosa de Ballí, who was issued the Llano Grande grant on May 29, 1790. Another successful rancher was José Manuel Gómez, who received the Santa Anita grant in 1798. In 1797 he established the Santa Anita Ranch, which was still in operation in 1995 under the name McAllen Ranch. Most of the other grantees also managed to settle their land and become successful ranchers.
By 1836 area farmers had a thriving economic base that allowed them to export their cattle and cattle by-products into Mexico. Goods were moved by wagon and mule trains, whose owners were so organized that they kept boats off the Rio Grande until after 1840. With the outbreak of the Texas Revolution (1835 - 1836) the area became disputed territory, Mexico considered it part of Tamaulipas, and Texas claimed it as part of its southern border. During the Mexican WarZachary Taylor laid out the Old Military Road to supply his men in northern Mexico. In 1849 the area became a popular stopping point for goldseekers from the United States on their way to California. The military road had become part of the Gila Route to the West Coast. By 1850 about thirty-nine ranches were in operation in what later became Hidalgo County . Mexico was the main market for goods from the area. Residents grew a variety of fruits and vegetables, including squash, citrus fruit, and corn. After 1849 the Oblates of Mary Immaculate periodically visited the ranches between Brownsville and Laredo. Hidalgo County was part of the disputed territory during the Mexican War. After the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 the area became part of San Patricio County. In the same year the region was further subdivided and became part of Cameron County.
     Hidalgo County was formed in 1852 and named for Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, who gave the "cry for Mexican independence" from Spanish rule. By 1852 the county had between forty and forty-five ranches. As land was parceled out from one generation to the next the ranches located along the river developed into villages. (Riverboat stops at villages along the Rio Grande were much earlier.  Roma, Los Saenz, Davis's Landing, Cuevitas, Pen~itas, Ojo de Agua, Granjeno/Reynosa, In this way, ranches gave rise to the communities of La Habitación, Relampago, and Peñitas. Ranches away from the river included Laguna Seca Ranch, founded in 1867, Mora Relámpago Ranch (1875), and San Manuel Ranch (1876). Generally, inhabitants of the area, especially those in the north, made a living by stock raising, while those along the river were involved in transportation, agriculture, and trade with Mexico. In 1852 La Habitación was renamed Edinburgh and made county seat. The first county court convened on September 2, 1852, and as its first act issued licences to ferries at Hidalgo, San Luis, Peñitas, and Las Cuevas. José M. J. Carbajal was an early court reporter. County residents were isolated from each other, however, and from the population center of Brownsville in neighboring Cameron County. Because of their sense of neglect by state and federal governments, residents adopted the name "Republic of Hidalgo." Isolation and ineffective law enforcement led to general chaos and lawlessness, mostly in the form of cattle raids and shootouts. The "Cortina Wars" also caused disturbances, especially when Juan Nepomuceno Cortina, on his way to a robbery, was intercepted by a force of Texas Rangersqv. The skirmish known as the battle of La Bolsa occurred on February 4, 1860, in El Zacatal, south of Progreso in southeast Hidalgo County. Despite difficulties, ranching dominated the economy in 1860, when 10,695 cattle and 3,330 sheep were counted; the latter produced 10,900 pounds of wool. Rustling also thrived. As early as December 28, 1862, armed Mexican bandits crossed into Los Ebanos, captured a Confederate wagontrain, and killed three teamsters. At other times Mexican cattle rustlers would cross into Texas with the purpose of stealing as many cattle as possible. Hidalgo County did not prosper from the Civil War as did Cameron County, but instead found itself battling cattle rustlers, who were joined by both Union and Confederate deserters. In 1870 rustlers were attracted to a county with 18,141 cattle and 11,270 sheep and a population of only 2,387. From 1872 to 1875 Sheriff Alex J. Leo repeatedly wired Washington requesting troops to curtail cattle rustling and end the "Cattle Wars," but his efforts were in vain. On April 2, 1875, Capt. Leander H. McNelly and a band of Texas Rangers arrived to help.
     Hidalgo County had become a haven for outlaws from both sides of the river by the middle of the nineteenth century. Politically it had become a battleground, as various groups vied for dominance of county politics. Party affiliations, especially with the Reds and  the Blues, were firmly entrenched by 1869.   (The writer of the screed we are editting, although noble in intent, fails to lower herself to the truth....that being that this is a continuing replay of the War Between the States.  Members of the Democrat  party, known as the Reds, included Thaddeus Rhodes, Ben Kidder, Pete Champion, W. P. Dougherty and James Dougherty tried to take advantage of an openning that did not exist.   This is because, since they were doltish people full of themselves and since they could produce handsful of Greenbacks rendered by the "Reconstruction Occupation" presence .)
 The Republican party members, the Blues, included John McAllen, Jesse Bennett, and Dr. Alexander M. Headley. The Reds ruled the county for most of the last third of the nineteenth century. Their ineffective government was blamed for the county's having eight sheriffs between 1869 and 1876. It was alleged that the Reds kept control of the county by using the pachanga or block vote, which entailed rounding up men,  filling them with food and liquor, and paying their poll tax. In Hidalgo County, Martin "Big Drunk" Norgraves, who served as first county clerk, was credited as organizer of block voting. By 1880 the population was 4,347, and all except women and the 114 African Americans were fair game for the parties looking for votes. Not until 1882, when John Closner was elected deputy sheriff, was control over cattle rustlers achieved. Closner became sheriff in 1890 and shortly afterward, under the protection of James B. Wellsqv, became the county's political boss. During his rule he brought peace to the county and was seen as such an effective leader that he was nicknamed the "father" of Hidalgo County. In the process, however, he made many enemies. During the 1890s his rivals tried to have him assassinated twice and brought a Texas Ranger investigation against him. He was accused of mistreating prisoners, and he later admitted that he could have gone a little too far in pressuring suspects to confess to crimes. Though Closner's Reds were effective in bringing law and order to the county the rivalry with the Blues did not abate. (This is not at all true.   White-trash desperadoes, and their Mexican-type cousins held up all stages and freight-wagons and people who did not pay some kind of tribute to the Closner machine.  The "Salt-Cart Wars" that plagued the Laredo - Corpus Christi - Roma area were an example. It had to be settled by the Rangers during one of their better, more noble periods,   Closner and his gang were very much the practictioners of "....good Mexicans are the ones who vote for us.  Bad ones vote for the Blues.
     All sides...every facet of the sociological whole....had their "good Mexican, good Gringo" measuring stick.  The measure depended upon which group was holding the measuring rod at the moment.  The idea, however, that the Closner mafia was somehow more kind and gentle with the Spanish / Mexican cohort of the population is bilge, poppycock, and silliness.)
     It came to a head in August 1890, when the Blues set up their polls and judges while the Reds held elections. This effectively gave the county two sets of officials. The Blues wanted to stop the Reds' use of the pachanga, which gave undocumented aliens access to the polls. Consequently, Dr. Headley and a company of 150 Blues took over Edinburgh and ruled the for several days under the moniker "Independent Republic of Hidalgo." United States officials ended Headley's "republic" when he attempted to collect customs at the border.
     Despite political turmoil and cattle rustling, the county population grew to 6,534 by 1890. Ranching reached its peak that year with 71,176 cattle; 20,906 sheep gave 41,074 pounds of wool. The Garza War came to an end in 1891, when Catarino Erasmo Garza and his men were defeated at La Joya in southwest Hidalgo County  (What is this?  My wife's family is involved with these people, the Catarino Garzas....they are still here, primarily Republicans, small business people, restauranteurs, professionals, doctors, nurses, farmers, etc.    The main issue here was that the "War" was (a) being tired of being accused of stealing cattle because some Mexicans were stealing cattle, and (b) People tired of having the Closner machine decide that "my Mexicans are good ranchers and cattle raisers, and your Mexicans are rustlers").
      In 1886 Edinburgh was washed away by a severe flood, after which it was moved to another flood-prone site about two miles north of the river. The county population was estimated at 6,837 in 1900. The Hidalgo Advance, the county's first newspaper, went into publication in March 1903. It was published for the sole purpose of advertising the county and attracting a railroad. When it arrived in 1904, the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway made a big difference. In 1903 land sold for twenty-five cents an acre,  (This is totally inaccurate.  Where is the "acre"?  If the acre is in an area scheduled to be at or near an irrigation canal, built by a reputable public, private, or mutual organisation, then the price was different from sandy, caliche-cursed drylands with essentially no value beyond waiting for oil / gas exploration wild-catteers), but by 1906 it was selling at fifty dollars an acre, and by 1910 the price had increased to as much as $300 an acre. (This is terribly false.  In 1942 my father bought land between Edinburg and McAllen for 200 Yankee dollars per acre. He bought 20 acres, within sight of a concrete paved thoroughfare, with all mineral rights included, and two preferential canals, one concreted and secondary, the other concreted and tertiary, to which he was also afforded water rights through the local rural water district).
    Farming in Hidalgo County was not practiced on a large scale until the latter part of the nineteenth century. (This is not because of some plan or ethnic hatred.  The Spanish / Mexican cohort were primarily ranchers...even sheep / wool ranchers.  The "Anglo" cohort was primarily dedicated to farming by plow and beast or tractor). Citrus fruits were among the first products cultivated. By 1878 Carlota Vela at the Laguna Seca Ranch had a small orange grove that was known for the quality of its fruit.  (This. once again,  is not exactly true.  Citrus was regarded as an "ornamental" until various investors came to the understanding that it would only be a 'crop' when volume of production could be increased at least a thousand-fold per acre.  John Shary was, essentially the one nutty enough to step off the diving board and join the sharks.   He won.  We are looking at times shortly after the wind-down of the Mexican Revolution of 1910.  Shary's greatest impact began in the 1930s.  One of "contributors" to A Gringo in Rural Mexico, is the grandson of this Mr. Shary....a true visionary, and risk-taking capitalist.)
  Later the primary crops were cotton and sugarcane planted on large plantations for export. The first attempt at growing cane on a large scale was made in 1883 by John Closner, who established (Did Closner 'establish' a plantation or did he "come into to it", as we say in the South?) a plantation and mill near the site of present-day Pharr. Attempts to irrigate rice were unsuccessful, but citrus fruits and vegetables were produced on a commercial basis starting around 1907, when W. A. Fitch planted a commercial-scale grapefruit orchard near Mercedes.
        
The words that were here before were authorized by the 1984 Authorisation Committee of the People.    We have tried to duplicate their words because of the laughable nature of said words.   But, we could not.
    The old county seat, Edinburgh, was moved away from the river and renamed Hidalgo.  (This is a kind of jibberish that 'qualified teachers' say in class because they are certificatiacalistaicalistic trained teachers.  It is not accurate.  In other words, if they say this they are (a) imbiciles, or (b) dumboes.)   The old county seat was named Hidalgo.  It was moved to Chapin's Ranch, later to be briefly dedicated as "Hidalgo"  and then later, as the city of Edinburgh, in honour of the birthplace of John McAllen.

    With the introduction of the railroad and the influx of settlers wishing to establish farms during the first decade of the twentieth century, the county's economic base shifted toward farming. The primary crops were corn and cotton. The population was estimated at 13,728 in 1910. In 1911 the San Benito and Rio Grande Valley Railway made junction with the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway at San Benito. The Texas and New Orleans built into the Valley in 1927.
     During the first decade of the twentieth century Closner and his Democratic machine ran unopposed, and nominees for district and state offices received 90 percent of the votes. In 1914 the county had only 700 Anglo-American Farmers who had paid their poll tax, as opposed to the 1,200 Hispanics that the Democratic machine could mobilize. (Most of these farmers were not Anglo.  Most were Germanic, Nordic,  Eastern European, and Heinz-57....the desire to lump all the "bad people" into the English group is a point well taken concerning the Gringo-hating intellectual class.   My grandmother awoke at 04:00 in 1917,  and drove from Ed Couch, Texas through bandit raid possibility, bad roads, and whatever to arrive at the Runn School, within sight of the Rio Grande to teach as a substitute.  She had an M.D. degree from the University of Minnesota.)




      In 1914 the Good Government League was established after Judge James H. Edwards was ousted by the Closner regime. The league was made up exclusively of Anglo farmers, businessmen, and professionals who supported Edwards and promised to "clean up" Hidalgo County politics. Because the league's intentions included disfranchising Hispanics, the campaign to change the system took on strong racial overtones. The Closner regime was perceived as pandering to Hispanics, although fewer than one-fourth of government positions were held by them. Racial and social tensions increased between old-timers, mainly ranchers, and newcomers, mainly farmers. Closner's reign ended in 1918, when an audit revealed that as county treasurer he had misappropriated $150,000 from the county, drainage districts, and the school district. Sheriff Anderson Y. Baker (A.Y. Baker, as he was known.  He is the grandfather of the lass on Hee-Haw who signs off with her "That's All!") then took control over the Democratic machine and maintained it for twelve years, through voter manipulation, election fraud, and large-scale graft. Because of the machine's shenanigans the Weslaco ballot box was thrown out during the 1928 county election. In the resulting "Hidalgo County Rebellionqv" the citizens of Weslaco armed themselves against the Mexican voters, whom they considered pawns of the machine. Weslaco's Anglo voters, all new farmers to the area and opposed to the regime, asked for and got a federal investigation. The investigation not only hurt the machine but further marginalized Hispanic voters, who were scared away from the polls. In 1929, in yet another attempt to oust the remnants of boss rule, the Good Government League, headed by Charles H. Pease, led a successful struggle to remove county government from control of a faction that monopolized irrigation projects and oil. Thus Wells and Closner's political machine, which ran Hidalgo County and caused its economic boom, was in the end ousted by the settlers it attracted.
    We tire of the corrections and observations.  We went though the destruction of the Uncle Remus land that the Lower Rio Grande Valley was at those times before 1960.   It cannot be recovered.  Social Engineers have used 'minorities' to assist in the social engineers advance to establish a 'fair, equal, and democratic' society.   They are wolves in wolves' clothing. They do not care how many babies are caught ''intact" at forced birth, or how many boys, ages 12 to 25 have blown each others' brains and guts out due to being in "families" involved in multigenerational public assistance.
      They, the social engineers, want abortion.  They want social democracy.  They want to live behind gated, gun-guarded entries so that the Ns and the Mexicans do not bother them.   They do, at times, make exceptions for people such as Huma and Valerie, both Iranian-born, hard-core marxists.    How truly strange.
  
     In 1920 the population was 38,110, more than double what it had been in 1910, and the number of farms had increased to 1,727, seven times the number of farms in 1890. John H. Shary, who became a successful land developer and promoter, arrived in Hidalgo County in 1912. Shary, who developed the citrus industry, was selling his grapefruit by 1919. In 1924 a regional Texas Agricultural Experiment Station was established in Weslaco. Thriving towns sprang up across the southern part of the county east to west along U.S. Highway 83, which by 1930 was described as the "longest main street in the world." Race relations in Hidalgo County during the nineteenth century had been fairly amicable even as the number of Anglo-Americans moving to the area increased. With the advent of the railroad Hidalgo County became a magnet for settlers from the Midwest and the East. These settlers, unlike their ranching predecessors, were not willing to adapt to Hispanic culture and considered themselves superior to Mexican Americans. Consequently, all the new towns that developed along the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway during the first twenty years of the twentieth century were fully segregated.
    The two best known for their segregation were Weslaco and McAllen, but most of the other towns along U.S. 83 were segregated, unlike the old towns of Hidalgo, Peñitas, and Relampago. The wall between the races became increasingly impenetrable. Between 1912 and 1915 border raids claimed at least thirty Anglo lives and several hundred Mexican lives, converted the area into a combat zone, and brought settlement to a halt. Though the raiders disrupted lives and stole cattle, law-enforcement officers were also accused of excessive violence and unjust practices. Toward the end of the 1920s, however, settlement resumed and segregation had become the norm. Because all the new towns were fully segregated it was impossible for Hispanic children to get an equal education. Inexperienced teachers were assigned to teach at the Mexican schools, which were usually overcrowded and ill equipped. There were no Mexican high schools because Hispanics were not expected to advance beyond elementary school. This deprivation led to self-perpetuating poverty as uneducated (and therefore poor) parents removed their children from school so that they could help support the family. In 1930 the county's population was estimated at 77,004, of which 41,522 individuals were identified as "Mexican."
     (We will not even begin to get into the matter of the massive....150,000 or so......the actual number will never be known precisely....number of people who came into southernmost Texas during the period of the Mexican Revolution, and to a lesser extent, the Cristero War almost immediately post-ceding the Revolution {1910 - 1917, then from around 1922 through 1927 respectively).  That human wave affected everything from San Antonio, to El Paso, to Brownsville.   Nothing in the article points this out.   The excessive use of the word "Hispanic" points to the fact that the writer wanted to make certain that the oppressor (Anglos who were not all Anglo) group was meany-poo to the great broad mass of little brown people who were Hispanic.   The Latin group was all but impossible to lump into any single group.  The sociological complexion was far, far more complicated than the explanations rendered here.
     Further, the notion that people of Mexican ancestry were not allowed or facilitated to attend high school is an out and out lie.  My mother-in-law and her brother were both valedictorians at La Joya, for instance.  The fact was that many, many of the incoming refugees had no tradition of general advanced or secondary education.  Many of the families saw no point in educating girls beyond primary, if even that.   Other of the Latin group with tradition of higher education, especially in the professions such as accounting and medicine, were commonly found graduating from high school and going "up-state" to the various public and private universities. 
      By 1930 the conversion of the economy to truck farming was complete. That year there were only 34,505 cattle, and the number of farms had increased to 4,321, more than double the number in 1920. The primary crops were cotton, planted on 131,884 acres, and corn, planted on 14,658 acres. Stock farming and ranching continued mainly in the northern part of the county, where cattle, sheep, and poultry were the main livestock. Despite the Great Depression, the county's population increased to 106,059 in 1940. The number of residents always fluctuated, however, during any given year because migrant farmworkers and winter Texans or "snowbirds" came and went. The first producing oil well in the county was brought in on September 18, 1934, by Otto C. Woods. The oil and gas industry soon became important in the county. With the increase in population the number of farms grew by 1940 to 5,094. Hidalgo County got its first military base in 1941, when Moore Air Field was built twelve miles northwest of Mission. The field was operated by the United States Army Air Force during World War II and was named for Lt. Frank Murchison Moore, a Texan. That year the county's sixty-two manufacturing establishments produced $6,502,129 in products. The population was estimated at 160,446 in 1950. By that year the county had 5,314 farms, and citrus fruit production had become the most important industry. That year's harvest yielded 3,093,792 boxes of oranges and 169,245 tons of grapefruit. Cotton production was 197,267 bales, and corn production was 72,495 bushels. The population of Hidalgo County was estimated at 180,904 in 1960. By 1967 the county had produced twenty million barrels of oil. In 1969 an estimated $50 million came from Hidalgo County's winter vegetables, citrus fruit, and cotton. That year the number of farms had declined to 4,124, a decrease attributable to the increase in farming corporations. By 1970 the population of Hidalgo County had reached 181,533. The civil-rights movement that had swept the country during the 1960s brought increased participation of Hispanics in Hidalgo County politics, though problems related to race were not over, as the "Pharr Police Riot" of 1971 illustrates (see PHARR, TEXAS). In Donna, migrant farmworkers' children were sent to a separate school until the late 1970s. Colonias started cropping up around the county as more Mexicans crossed the Rio Grande in an attempt to improve their lives, and some local businessmen exploited the recent migrants by selling them useless land. The immigration increased throughout the 1970s. The population doubled between 1970 and 1977, to an estimated 232,300. By 1978 Hidalgo County was averaging $188 million in annual farm income, 90 percent of which came from cotton, corn, citrus fruit, sugarcane, and grain. Also by that year the average annual income from mineral production, including oil and gas, was $65 million. The peso devaluation of 1976 did not have an immediate effect on the economy of the Rio Grande valley. Not until the mid-1980s did area merchants who catered to Mexican nationals began to experience the negative effects of the several devaluations that occurred in that decade. Clothiers, jewelers, car dealers, and some real estate agents were hurt; agribusiness, ranching, and the oil industry suffered less.
     In 1980 the population was estimated at 283,229, including 15,868 retired workers. The industries with the most workers were agribusiness, tourism, oil and gas field servicing, construction, frozen food processing and canning, meat packing, and soft drink bottling, industries which earned an aggregate of $1,575,879,000. In 1982 Hidalgo County had 171 manufacturers with 7,100 employees and products valued at $211.9 million. In 1982 Hidalgo County was ranked sixty-fourth among all United States counties in the highest birth rate and twelfth in highest percent of Hispanic-origin residents. The county has never experienced a decrease in population. Its residents numbered 383,545 in 1990. Hispanics, Germans, and Anglo-Americans are the three largest ethnic groups. But the labor force that made Hidalgo County a prosperous agricultural region also made it the poorest in the nation. The McAllen-Edinburg-Mission metropolitan area had the lowest per capita income (estimated at $7,001) in the United States in 1987. Furthermore, Hidalgo County had the state's highest unemployment rate, and county government was so underfunded   (One could possibly make the case that the "independent health-care programme was over untilised, in that the user group is famous for going down to the emergency room for the slightest matter, including sore-throats, ear aches, fevers of less than 100F and "nerves".) that its independent health-care program ran out of money halfway through the fiscal year.
    Nevertheless, corporations were doing well, and by 1988 more than $1 billion a year in goods passed through the foreign trade zone located south of McAllen in south central Hidalgo County. After its warehouses filled up that year, the foreign trade zone had to turn away tenants (One appreciates the tone, in that sympathy is rendered to  "the poor, neglected people" who demand free medical services, required because they have babies for whom no arrangements are made before pregnancy, while the dirty mean corporations should be hated because they were responsible enough to make a profit, stay in business, and provide employment, frequently including retirement and medical coverage as part of the wage package....dirty, mean, horrible company.)

  In 1988 Hidalgo County hosted 80,000 "winter Texans." Retail sales rose 22.6 percent that year. Little profit found its way to the poorest people, however, a fact reflected in the standard of living of colonia dwellers, of whom an estimated 52,000 lived in 366 colonias in 1986. The problems of inadequate water supply and substandard housing were rife among colonia residents, many of whom were migrant farmworkers. It was hoped that in the 1990s part of the problem would be solved by new trade and opportunities for employment brought by the North American Free Trade Agreement. Because of its proximity to Mexico, Hidalgo County was also a favored entry point for drug smugglers. In 1992 it was discovered that an unusually high number of children born in the county were being born with anencephaly, a neural birth defect. As of 1989, twenty-seven out of every 10,000 babies born to Hispanic women in the area had neural birth defects, and this situation had not improved by 1992, when women of child-bearing age were told to consume folic acid to prevent further defects while various organizations studied the problem.  (Ambulance chasing guardians of the poor, filed suit in Brownsville in defense of some women in Matamoros who were certain that their abodes,  being adjacent to an American maquiladora, caused them to have essentially encephalic babies.   Although the jury found in favour of the plaintiffs it was well established later that the women had all essentially lived on lard, flour tortillas, and the like, ingesting almost nothing remotely like folic acid.  To date, none of the women have returned any of the money....most of which was probably spent on nail salons and lottery tickets.) Inhabitants of Hidalgo County consistently voted Democratic from 1852 to 1992, with the exceptions of the 1860, 1928, 1952, 1956, and 1972 elections. Recreation facilities in the county include the Hidalgo County Historical Corridor which spans the southern portion of the county and various parks and wildlife refuges, including Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge and the Las Palomas Wildlife Management area. Special events include the Citrus Fiesta, the Weslaco Sugarfest, and the Rio Grande Valley Stock Show. Fishing and hunting are also available throughout the year. The county has several museums and historic homes. La Lomita Mission is located in Mission, and the Virgen de San Juan del Valle Shrine is in San Juan. See also AGRICULTUREBOSS RULE.
BIBLIOGRAPHY: 
James Lewellyn Allhands, Gringo Builders (Joplin, Missouri, Dallas, Texas, 1931). Evan Anders, Boss Rule in South Texas: The Progressive Era (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982). Guide to Spanish and Mexican Land Grants in South Texas (Austin: Texas General Land Office, 1988). Thomas Hester, Digging into South Texas Prehistory: A Guide for Amateur Archaeologists (San Antonio: Corona Press, 1980). Hidalgo County Centennial Corporation, The Centennial Celebration of the Organization of Hidalgo County in Texas (Mission, Texas: Times Publishing Company, 1952). David Montejano, Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas, 1836–1986 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1987). W. Clyde Norris, History of Hidalgo County (M.A. thesis, Texas College of Arts and Industries, 1924). J. Lee and Lillian J. Stambaugh, The Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (San Antonio: Naylor, 1954). Vertical Files, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. David Martell Vigness, The Lower Rio Grande Valley: 1836–1846 (M.A. thesis, University of Texas, 1948).

Sunday, 2 August 2015

COMING UP FOR DEPARTURE TIME - We begin leaving a potpourri of thoughts.....

______________________________________________________

    These various points all have their roots firmly planted in the soil of understanding and misunderstanding.   The use, overuse, and indiscriminate use of words....in the shoddy approach to reaching a conclusion by non-critical thought and imprecise expression....weighs upon this mediocre writer.   Inferior intellectual processes, and incorrect notions about the meanings and origins of words dog even the best of us and those who have the best intentions.

     (1)   You are a bad person because you are a racist and because we are all immigrants.   You are a racist because you say bad things about immigrants who do not look like you.

     To begin, most of the people who are coming across the borders of the United States, and certainly of Texas without benefit of necessary paperwork and entry permits are definitively NOT immigrants.   They are aliens....persons not citizens of the country in which they find themselves..and they are therefore illegal.  Illegal Aliens....not immigrants.
       An immigrant is a person who interns according to the permissions and  conditions of the nation receiving that immigrant.   He or she is known as a legal alien which is a lot better and healthier than being an illegal alien.

         Therefore, when we are invaded by people who chose to not abide by the law and they arrive especially with the intent to whelp on American soil so as to have a cause that justifies being allowed to remain in the country because one's infant daughter or son needs her or his mother nearby at such a time, we are not being invaded by immigrants.   We are being invaded by parasitic organisms  who have found the promised land of 35,000 dollars worth of support simply by whelping one.   Texas has become unwilling now to issue birth certificates to without identification of any kind.

     Those of you who think you are doing wonderful things by going to the "immigrant emegency care centres" with money, food, clothes and the like might feel really good about helping someone who is downtrodden.   The fact is, however, that many of the same people who are coming over here have been or continue to be involved in on-going criminal activity.   One learns as he/she deals with the "immigrants" and their "already here children'' that they are a sullen bunch.   There is little or no gratitude expressed for the free goodies they are receiving.   They frequently openly complain about the clothes, food, shoes, underwear, women's necessities, toiletries, and even money they are given.   They make it plain that there are two realities.  One, everything back in Honduras or El Salvador was better....and two, everything  in Texas is garbage....and more had been expected.
       This message is mixed into the Queen for a Day tales about how bad things are in Honduras and El Salvador.   One has a hard time keeping it straight.  The Roman Catholic parishes and agencies have specialists who "provide care" and help the"immigrants" make it to their next destination (why?).  They speak of the "immigrants" as if they are a special people and we are blessed to have them among us.   But in the bus station at McAllen, armed with their free goodies, free money, gifts from people they do not know, nor five a damn about....the "immigrants" freely talk about what a dump Texas is and how much worse they have been treated as compared to what they had expected.   They openly express resentment that so-and-so "got" more and better "stuff" than the complainant.  "I have three children and I am pregnant, and she only had two.   So why did they give her 600 dollars and me only 390 dollars?"

    These people are not immigrants...and they should not...must not be confused with the bulk of the Latin population that was invested in this country before 1965. Frankly, most of the illegal aliens who are here right now are a net positive group....but that margin shrinks daily.   The criminal element, as a percentage of the universe of illegal aliens is increasing rapidly, on an hourly and daily basis, especially those originating from El Salvador,  Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Honduras.    We have addressed the absurdity of the notion that O'Reilly can say that "....over 230 people have been murdered in the last 6 years by 'undocumented immigrants'. 
         As we repeat that the actual figure of people killed feloniously over that time is much closer to 1.2 / day.    And they are not immigrants.  They are illegal aliens.
_____________________________________________________

(2)   Next we have the word "hero".   My FOX News people repeatedly referred to a nice woman, a store proprietrix, who went forth and knocked out the window of a motorcar because a two-year old had been encountered in the vehicle, drenched in sweat.....at the very point of heat prostration and/or stroke.   Her body temperature was 104 degrees, even some minutes after her liberation from the oven that was her mother's auto.
     The lady who owned the stored was repeatedly called a Hero.   If in fact she had been qualified for such a title it would have been more properly ''Heroine", because of her gender....which some people still have, without  doubt.
     But Hero or Heroine, it is required to expose oneself to almost certain or certain serious injury or even death without regard to such consequences when involved in the saving or another human's life or risk of very serious injury.    The word "Hero" was used, even yesterday, when one of our Barbies referred to a Copper who had stopped his patrol and gotten down on the sidewalk with a gaggle of nicely presented and civilized pre-teen boys.   They had one of their bicycles in intensive care, due to a slipped chain.
     Because the Police Patrolman stopped and put the chain on and made the adjustments necessary for it to stay on, our Bimbo referred to him as a Hero on three or four more effusive segments.   No...not hero, Señorita Bimbo.  You are a nice girl...but the policeman was a Good Samaritan...he was noble...he was not "too good" to get down and really help what to the boys seemed to be a major disaster.   He was, simply, a good man going out of his way to do a good thing.
     Last year, maybe he was a hero....perhaps three months from now, he will be called upon to be a hero.   But last week sometime, depending when the phone-video was made.....he was just that guy that stopped and made everything perfect for four boys he did not know....just because he could.  'Nuf Sed, and Dun.
___________________________________________

(3)     The UBS Bank and (Sir Edmund) Hillary.   Flabbergasting.  Billy Jeff receives 1.6 million dollars in "speaking fees'' from the Union Bank of Switzerland, as well as other considerations to (Sir Edmund) Hillary herself that ran into seven figures for the Clinton's 'global initiative'.   This is after the State Department decided to "help" the Union Bank of Scotland avoid compliance with certain demands being made by various investigations into the nature of confidential accounts by foreign leaders and "important" personalities.   Among these could be the billionaire leaders of the "poor" such as the estate of Yassir Arafat, the Castro Brothers of Cuba, and  various of such ilk.....including, some say,  Marc Rich...the "investment analyst" who made off with a third of a billion dollars of other folks' money back in 1990.

     Were these two....(Sir Edmund) Hillary and Billy Jeff Blythe....to have been Republicans, the piles of license plates would never have been finished over at the Department of Corrections.
_______________________________________

     We  have a couple of more entries to-morrow, and then we'll be heading South for a few weeks.
El Gringo Viejo
________________________________________

Friday, 31 July 2015

Last Chance Samoon.....

________________________________________________


__________________________________________________

This is the last time before a couple of years from that we can celebrate a real, live Blue Moon.    Who knows, we may never have a chance to see if the bleu cheese on the Moon tastes different from what we have down here.

El Gringo Viejo
________________________________________

Thursday, 30 July 2015

Enough reason to never vote for Jeb.....so sad.....

______________________________________________________
Recent interview with Bloomberg Financial News

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) acknowledges human activity contributes to climate change but cautioned against actions that would harm the U.S. economy. In written answers to Bloomberg BNA, Bush said the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan is “irresponsible and ineffective” and “oversteps state authority.” He also tells Bloomberg BNA reporter Anthony Adragna that phasing out the renewable fuel standard “over time” is the “proper thing to do.” Bush, who served as Florida governor from 1999 to 2007, also called approving the proposed Keystone XL pipeline a “no brainer.” Bloomberg BNA has reached out to all presidential campaigns and will publish other substantive responses in the days ahead. 
Bloomberg BNA:Is climate change occurring? If so, does human activity significantly contribute to it?
Bush: The climate is changing; I don’t think anybody can argue it’s not. Human activity has contributed to it. I think we have a responsibility to adapt to what the possibilities are without destroying our economy, without hollowing out our industrial core. 
I think it’s appropriate to recognize this and invest in the proper research to find solutions over the long haul but not be alarmists about it. We should not say the end is near, not deindustrialize the country, not create barriers for higher growth, not just totally obliterate family budgets, which some on the left advocate by saying we should raise the price of energy so high that renewables then become viable. 
U.S. emissions of greenhouse gasses are down to the same levels emitted in the mid-1990s, even though we have 50 million more people. A big reason for this success is the energy revolution which was created by American ingenuity—not federal regulations. 
Bloomberg BNA:Should the Keystone XL pipeline be approved?
Bush: Yes. Construction of the Keystone pipeline is a no brainer. It moves us toward energy independence and creates jobs. The President’s politically motivated veto of the pipeline is an example of how this administration supports policies that suppress economic growth.
________________________________________________

Dear Jeb:
     Global warming begins with the rising of the sun.   If it is climate change that you are trying to scare the hell out of the children about, try telling them that there have been thousands of climate changes during the existence of the planet Earth.   Tell them about the coal deposits in the Antarctic.
     If it is the intensity of the numerous storms and hurricanes that we are suffering, try the Galveston Hurricane of 1900.
       Please spare us.  You do not know the difference between Pacific water layer inversion and the aurora borealis.
Sheeeeesh!!
El Gringo Viejo

PAGE TWO - MITOFSKY: The Bad Boys

____________________________________________________________

    As with the "most admired" , there are five top finishers in the category of ''historical villains" of Mexico.

Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna           10.3%
Porfirio Diaz                                          8.5
Victoriano Huerta                               3.7
Francisco (Pancho) Villa                  1.3
Hernan Cortez                                      1.0
______________________________________________


     This list of miscreants is equally complicated.  There are twenty-five per cent of the respondents who brought up the top five.   Notice that the percentages fall rapidly from a little over 10% down to slightly more than one per cent.   That means that over three-quarters of the respondents named people who did not make it up to the  1% level.  Talk about a Chinese fire-drill in a movie theatre.

      But, please take note.  At least one of every ten Mexicans say that the worst of the worst was  Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.   It was not only the losing of a war that he had already won by relaxing his guard against a force nowhere near as large or demonstrably capable as his army.   It had to do as well with the depredations by Santa Anna of the States of Zacatecas and to a lesser extent, Durango.   It had to do with the merciless subjugation of the Yucatan Peninsula....all of this related directly or indirectly to the issues surrounding the Constitucion de 1824, that Santa Anna had once supported, then eschewed when it was time to be Supreme Ruler.
     It is also that these Mexicans know that Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna essentially blunted the southward extension of the American Army outside of Saltillo during the Mexican War with the United States in 1848 (actually the victory belonged to two subordinate field commanders, including Gen. Pedro Ampudia).   They also know that he came towards Mexico City finally amassing a force of some say 80,000 effectives including various national guard units worthy of the name (others say 40,000 - 50,000 would have been more accurate).
     Whichever figure would have been a significant number of troops, and with other elements that could be brought up from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec it could have spelled disaster to an American force that was much smaller and essentially trapped in Mexico City.   Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, however did not attack or even make a bellicose gesture.  His obvious intention was to come in to Mexico City after the departure of the Gringos with a large force, and assume the presidential throne again.

     Lopez de Santa Anna was something very similar to the Clintons.  Thoroughly corrupt, brutally violent, unimpeded by concerns about morality or criminality, mendacious in the extreme, and wholly self-consumed.   The people finally tired of him after a few more minor episodes of hopeful pseudo-grandeur and he was exiled.   He lived in New York City for a time, and then was relegated to the saloons along the harbour and plaza promenades of La Habana de Cuba.   He returned late in life to a dingy apartment in downtown Mexico City, where he died in the cold, forgotten and un-missed.

     The OROG will remember that Porfirio Diaz was on the "good list" coming in at 3%.   He scored much higher on the ''bad list", almost three times more saying that Porfirio was a bad thing for Mexico.  He had a good twenty-year run at being essentially a re-elected dictator.  He re-established law and order, albeit with an iron hand, that caught innocents and misdemeanours, who received the same harsh punishments as the numerous bandits and highwaymen.   He was also accused of "allowing Mexico to become the Mother of Foreigners and step-mother of Mexicans".   This was because of the massive influx of rail, steel, precious metals, glass, liquor and beer, agricultural production that was provoked by British, German, Japanese, French, and other foreign investment.   America was about in third place among the nations in the world making fortunes and building a huge middle class among the Mexicans.
     Another favourite quote of the day, attributed to Porfirio Diaz was the famous line,"Poor Mexico, so far from God and so close to the United States."  At the time, it is said, he was showing off the final stages of the building of the Palacio de Bellas Artes, to this day a stunning theatre with a Tiffany glass curtain one-third the size of a football field...curtain being worth perhaps ten million dollars.   As the five-score Italians master marble finishers were winding up their work, they may have heard Diaz make that statement to a delegation of Japanese businessmen.   Some of those later had something to do with the establishment of a beer company that has since become something called "Corona"....the original effort began in the 1890s under the still produced label of "Estrella", long since folded into the Grupo Modelo in the 1920s and now, lamentably, owned by Anhauser-Busch and Hienekins consortia...a Brazilian / Belgian concern that carefully isolates its Mexican business to the local market, and then to the export of Corona to over 150 countries, Texas included.

     Diaz was "overthrown" by an "election".   The elections of 1910 resulted in an absurd vote count, something like 2,000,000 to 134....I forget the precise numbers....and the loser promptly declared that Sufragio Efectivo / NO Re-eleccion!!! would be the unconditional condition for the removal of Don Porfirio from the Presidential Palace.   After some considerable warfare for about one year, Francisco I Madero came in triumphal entry to Mexico City, accompanied by the not-so-rag-tag armies that had defeated a pretty good military organization.   Diaz was given a deluxe train-ride to Vera Cruz and then was placed on a steamer first to Cuba, and then to Spain, where he died.   There is a movement that began not long ago, to repatriate the remains of Porfirio to Mexico, as a way of recognising that he had done far more good than damage during his quarter century of ruling the country with an iron hand.

     Also, suffice it to say that "Sufragio Efectivo'' for women did not happen until after 1952, and as in the case of the Unite States, it solved all the problems at that time and everything has been perfect since that time...just like in the United States.
_____________________________________________

     As with the previous entry, anyone wishing an early definition of the other personalities not discussed can request such information, given in my own way.  These fellows will be analysed during coming days and weeks in any regard, along with other commentary regarding El Chapo and such things.

We shall return to-morrow.   Thanks as usual for your time and interest.
El Gringo Viejo
_______________________________________

Mexican Heroes and Villains - the Mitofsky Survey sorts them out

___________________________________________________

     Before we bring the OROG community opinion, fact, or conjecture about Mexico, please understand that Mexico is a place where one walks into a saloon and takes a poll about who the most important person in Mexican history is, and with ten people present, the poll renders 35 persons as "most important".    While this tale is a bit over-stated, there is some truth to it, due to the Mexican proclivity to try to not offend.
       One of the attitudinal surgery and political preference survey companies that we have come to rely upon is the highly respected Mitofsky Survey.   They do constant analysis, and their work on major local and State races has been remarkable over the years.   Their analysis of the Presidential races has been stunning.   So, when other work, more academic and/or commercial, is done, we also stuff that in the old pipe and smoke it.

      Sometimes, readers here will have to endure El Gringo Viejo making a declaratory and, with a flourish of the universal sweep of his left hand and arm,  state a fact as simply being true because he says so.   We apologise for such conceit, but we do submit that those suppositions also come from very much study and very much experience with, about, within, and concerning facts and conjecture about Mexico.

     One of the things that Mexicans will argue and discuss ad infinitum is whether or not this or that villain or hero was a villain or a hero.  It never ends.   But so that the OROG will know, the last Mitofsky survey about such things did reveal the dichotomy, the dynamic polemic, and even the somewhat schizophrenic evaluation of important personages in Mexico's past.

     We launch into a painless set of examples by first informing the readership that we did a pretty fair analysis of this data, below, yesterday.  We also put the graphics directly on the screed....but the graphics from Mitofsky disappeared during the day, thereby ruining the point of the article.  So, everything was, stupidly, deleted in a spate of infantile frustration on my part.   However, this is such a good, interesting, and elucidating set of figures that I know it will (a) vindicate my stated assumptions and facts on this blog, and (b) give those OROGs and other who are interested in advancing their understanding of a nation as complicated as Mexico another few bricks to build their wall of knowledge.   To wit:


HEROES

Benito Juarez Garcia                                  18.9%
Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla                         14.2
Fransciso (Pancho) Villa                            7.3
Emiliano Zapata                                            6.0
Porfirio Diaz                                                    3.0

     As we total up these figures, it comes up to about 50% of the total respondents.   Other could have named Lazaro Cardenas, the "Great Expropriator" who established the Mexican National oil monopoly Petroleos Mexicanos - PEMEX, thereby miring Mexico in a sloth-pit of socialism that has endured until even these days.   Mexico is climbing out of that oil, gas, and petro-chemical pit finally and wondrous things are not going to happen...they are already occurring, as an avalanche of technology, professionalism, and competition.  But now, the lustre is gone from Cardenas....his son, Cuautemoc Cardenas drove the name into the ground with several losing efforts at becoming President, and PEMEX looking better with each step towards privatization does not help the ancient image of Lazaro Cardenas.    Same with Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador...another constant candidate for President or something, at one time thought of as an icon, but after a few months of blocking the main plaza in Mexico City and "occupying" about thirty blocks of the most attractive and heavily travelled boulevard in Latin America....his lustre also dulled.   None of those personalities polled as much as one per cent. 

     We shall study Benito Juarez, since he is the leader of those most admired.  From the point of view of El Gringo Viejo, he was a grumpy old man at a young age.   He hated the same people who made him a great political and legal thinker.   He was a full-blooded Zapotec Indian, from the wildest mountains of east central Oaxaca State in the south of Mexico.   Because of evidence of advanced intelligence, he was forwarded by his family and religious workers to the care of a really fine academy in the city of Oaxaca run by cloistered sisters of a remarkable convent.   As a child of the outlying areas, he was accommodated by a well-to-do family, pretty much as an adoptee.
     To his credit, he was adamant and ardent about that in which he believed.  He became an eloquent voice in the issues supported by the Reformers.  That was the liberal group....filled with prototypical international socialists, haters of organised  religion, haters of the wealthy, mockers of the traditions, and ardent enemies of hard money.  
  He essentially wrote (this is somewhat but not convincingly refuted by some historians) the ultra-democratic Constitucion de 1857 that for all practical purposes expropriated the Roman Catholic Church out of existence in Mexico, as well as major portions of lands that had been considered communitarian by the indigenous peoples...Otomi, Tarascan, Tlaxcalan, Maya, Zapotec, Mixtec, Huichole, Huastec, Totonac, and other nations.
     While some (in the opinion of this writer), if not most, of the lands that had been awarded by the Throne during the colonial period probably should have been "re-awarded" in some manner, stripping the wealthy of their ranching and very fine production of tropical fruits, corn, scores of fine vegetable and cotton and hennequin plantations would have been a disaster for Mexico as a nation.   And, please to remember, in those days...the 1850s...the "nation" of Mexico was very much five to seven separate entities....more if the Indian nations were to be treated as the entities they actually were.

     Benito Juarez was a Scottish Rite Mason, because all liberal leaders in Mexico were of that order.   It saved Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna from the firing squad or noose in the moments after the Battle of San Jacinto, for instance, when he identified himself as a Mason to Samuel Houston.  Of course, Lopez de Santa Anna had ceased being a "liberal" leader three or four re-inventions of his persona before meeting Houston.
    The difference between the common Mason and Benito  was that Juarez was obfuscative when it came to accepting, as all Masons must,  that there is a Supreme Cosmic Force and Intelligent Entity.  One can be a Jew, Muslim, Christian of any sort, Buddhist, Shintoist, Hindu, etc. but belief upon and in The Supreme Being is fundamental in Masonic canon.  Juarez is not known for his fielty to that point.


     To me, Juarez was as self-consumed as one of our favourite female Presidential candidates.  He was chased out of the Presidency by conservative and Church interests, who gained favour from the corpus populi due to the anarchy that broke out during the clumsy implementation of the above cited Constitucion.  The Conservatives went to Europe and essentially begged for the loan of a monarch.  The Hapsburg House was brought into the deal, with the King of Belgium and the important backing of Napoleon III and the Bishop of Rome (Pope).   It was arranged that a very popular, dashing, Arch-Duke...brother to King Franz Josef, king of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Bohemia.  Franz Josef took the opportunity to rid himself of his more popular brother, and to give that brother a "real live Empire" with a real live throne and a Palace and soldiers with uniforms fit for any opera.  (Please obtain the books, The Crown of Mexico, Joan Haslip,  and  The Cactus Throne.  the author's name escapes me at this moment).
     Maximilian and his Belgian Empress Carlotta came into Mexico in 1864 and did a fair to middling job as Emperor.  Once things started running better, however, Max decided to literally go bird-watching and butterfly collecting in the South of Mexico, while the Republican counter-revolution was welling up in the North.   Long story short, Maximilian went to assume personal command of the Imperial Army in Queretaro, and after a prolonged siege and considerable loss of life, the Republicans forces won the day and the War.   In fairly short order Maximilian was shot before a firing squad, as were his two generals, Miramar and Mexia.   As an aside it should be pointed out that Max's two theatre level generals were racially Mestizo, while all of the "Indian President's" field commanders were White and Roman Catholic.

     My further opinion of Juarez is tempered by the fact that he was willing to sell every Mexican's birthright in order to raised the funds that were needed to re-install himself into the Presidency.  He offered both Abraham Lincoln (with whom he communicated frequently) and later Andrew Johnson territory in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec for the purpose of building a "Panama Canal".   Lincoln was enthralled with the idea and even  commented that it would be a good place to send the "emancipated" slaves and other Negroes "because they are better adapted to such climates".  Very enlightened, our Father Abraham...and our national hero, Benito.
       The story is told about an Italian onyx and marble stone finisher, working on the incredible Palacio de Bellas Artes during the regime of Porfirio Diaz, during the 1880s.   During the quiet times in the evenings the Mexicans at his favorite saloon would talk about the Great Presidente Benito.  Very impressed by these tales of patriotism, democracy. and loyalty to cause, the Italian returned to Italy and repeated these tales, especially to his brother.  In due course, the time came for the brother's wife to be delivered, several years later...and the brother dutifully named his baby after this inspiring Hero of the People.
"The Christian name of this child, Mr. Mussolini?"

"Benito," he responded to the priest at the baptism.

      But this is neither here nor there.  In politics in Mexico as in the United States of America perception is more important than fact.
________________________________

     The number two fellow is Father Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, also known as the Father of Mexico...and as the person who "Pronounced" the Revolution for Independence of Mexico from Spain on 15 September 1810 at 23:00 hours, from the belfry of his parish church in the community of Dolores, Guanajuato.  While Hidalgo was killed not so long after this act, he is the one who put into motion that irresistible force (Mexico) that finally destroyed the immovable object (Spain).
    On all these other folks cited as Heroic, we shall comment a bit more at a later moment.   Many, many books have been written about all of them.   They deserved all the study that has been given their personalities and quirks and motives.
___________________________________________

This afternoon, the good Lord willing and the Devil not objecting, I shall delve into the "Bad Boys" a bit.
El Gringo Viejo
___________________________________________