What difference does it make?

 

The logic employed by Hillary Rodham Clinton makes sense to people who believe that it is necessary to defend her first, and at all cost, because she, in and of herself, is greater than any issue confronting the United States or the world.   One of the first people who are advocates of this insane position is Hillary Rodham Clinton.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



I just have one thought:  Me
 

Hillary Rodham Clinton travels with a stylist and a large

 staff of servants and attendants who make certain that she is "sick",

  "ill"  "indisposed" "has previous engagements",  "is involved in delicate

 diplomacy" "has a concussion" "has the flu" "has intestinal flu".

 According to the flight master,"The White House says to keep her liquor

 cabinet full, and out of Washington until we can program some canned

filibuster evasions for her hearing.  Call the usual places for

 invitations to funerals and "highlevel talks".

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



      The next group of people who believe it is necessary to defend any mendacious conjuring of testimony by Madame Secretary is that group which believes fervently in free and legal abortion without condition.   There is some kind of sickness among people who cannot disconnect abortion from a military/geopolitical issue or from any issue.  It is the basis for excusing and even vindicating all manner of sickness, depravity, and incompetence among a category of politicians and excoriating others who have little or no fault save opinion or conviction of principle.

      Examples, and probably not even the best of many examples, are Hillary Rodham, Barney Frank, Edward Kennedy, and William Jefferson Blythe.  The number of dead people, of parking tickets fixed for homosexual "escort service" operators, of cover-ups of felonies, and hypocritical positions, mega-whoppers,  invasion of the exchequer for personal benefit, pardons-for-sale, rapes, physical assaults of women, and so forth is staggering.   The reaction to all whoppers and transgressions of the normal concepts of decency and morality by the Obsolete Press and the leftist cabal is something less than what a person would have upon finding a flat tire on his motorcar.

     El Gringo Viejo is driven back into his cave of remembrances about Clarence Thomas.  When he was nominated to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the leftist cabal determined to Bork him because he was an ungrateful Uncle Tom who had wandered off the socialist welfare plantation.  The Bush Administration, ever willing to be reasonable, was going to pull his nomination back, but Thomas and some of his RINO Republican backers (oddly) who agreed that Thomas was a worthy candidate, decided to fight.   Their fight was against charges that Thomas had somehow been "offencive and had practised sexual harassment" against  a woman by the name of Anita Hill.  When it became apparent that the charges were groundless, the "women's movement" people said that the invalidity of the charges was not important.  What was important was the "seriousness of the charges",  and that anyone who had been charged for such horrid offences should not be considered for such and important position.

     The public now either never knew this story, or if knowing, does not care.   At first, even after all the normal vetting of such an nominee, a sudden "witness' came forward with the horrible story about the sex-crazed, obsessed, and vile man who ....when all was said and done made a lewd remark about some porno star, and during his batching period had a Playboy pinup on his wall.    That was pretty thin milk to sling, especially considering that Edward Kennedy and Christopher Dodd had essentially raped, simultaneously, and in a public place, a waitress in an up-scale restaurant in Washington D.C. and, along with the press, had made light of the issue...essentially passing it off as a good-natured payback to an overly flirtatious waitress.   Such was anything but the truth, it was, in fact a lie.

      To wit: 

Michael Kelly’s famous piece on Kennedy, here’s the immortal passage on the “waitress sandwich” he once created with his buddy Chris at La Brasserie:
 

The fine and upstanding
and very liberal, defender of
women, Christopher Dodd

 

     It is after midnight and Kennedy and Dodd are just finishing up a long dinner in a private room on the first floor of the restaurant’s annex. They are drunk. Their dates, two very young blondes, leave the table to go to the bathroom. (The dates are drunk too. “They’d always get their girls very, very drunk,” says a former Brasserie waitress.) Betty Loh, who served the foursome, also leaves the room. Raymond Campet, the co-owner of La Brasserie, tells [waitress Carla] Gaviglio the senators want to see her.



Edward Moore Kennedy
The Lion of the Senate

As Gaviglio enters the room, the six-foot-two, 225-plus-pound Kennedy grabs the five-foot-three, 103-pound waitress and throws her on the table. She lands on her back, scattering crystal, plates and cutlery and the lit candles. Several glasses and a crystal candlestick are broken. Kennedy then picks her up from the table and throws her on Dodd, who is sprawled in a chair. With Gaviglio on Dodd’s lap, Kennedy jumps on top and begins rubbing his genital area against hers, supporting his weight on the arms of the chair. As he is doing this, Loh enters the room. She and Gaviglio both scream, drawing one or two dishwashers. Startled, Kennedy leaps up. He laughs. Bruised, shaken and angry over what she considered a sexual assault, Gaviglio runs from the room. Kennedy, Dodd and their dates leave shortly thereafter, following a friendly argument between the senators over the check.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     So, why bring up such disgusting sluggery?   To tie the points together, that is why.   Lyndon Johnson was a liberal Democrat who was excused all manner of depravity, and around whom circulated many, many stories of obtuse corruption and  peculiar early demises.   But he was slowly accepted by the progressives because Franklin Roosevelt was his political godfather, and because he had no sense of any kind of morality, he might be useful in forwarding the social welfare debacle in which we find ourselves now mired.  Great Society, anyone?
     The Kennedy Brothers, interesting, roguish, fascinating in a morbid way, but of all of them, the least valuable...Teddy...a drunken, whoring, misogynist.  Raped and assaulted women abound in his vitae...prostitutes in open display...dead young women...but for liberals and socialists...boys will be boys.   Bill Clinton...so long as he would work to extend abortion and push a generally leftist agenda...he could rape, indulge, assault, and have any degenerate history and he was cleared for take-off..a brilliant man (he is actually rather dull, but like many white trash, he is cunning and willing to take unto himself that which is not nailed down)!  Simply Fascinating!

     El Gringo Viejo asks and asks, again and again.  Why?   He is white-trash, through and through, never makes sense when saying anything, panders to the weaknesses of people, is totally self-consumed, is an adjudged liar, disbarred and fined during his presidency for such offences...and has never done anything for anybody worthy of mention.   But, he is lauded like his horrid "wife"  for "all he has done" for the left handed Eskimo lesbian astronauts, or Haiti...now there's a good one...Haiti....and he rebuilt that funny little place that had the Tsunami....look at all the social improvement there has been for the coloured folks...'cause he has an office in Harlem...do we remember?

     And the issue of Barney Frank and Gary Studds, both thoroughly corrupt in a legal sense, and in a moral sense, but both receiving standing ovations when they returned to the floor of the House of Representatives.  Their numerous and continuing offences, unrelated one to the other or in time-frame, were ghastly, horrible abuses of power and expressions of hubris and perfect arrogance.  But, because they were extreme leftists, pro-abortion, and homosexuals...they received standing ovations from their Democrat cohorts because of their "bravery".  Corzine, Weiner, Torecelli,  Nagin, Hamilton, Rangel, and on and on and on.  When Republicans do bad things..they are flushed, usually by the party itself.  Democrats and leftists, they are applauded and marvelled at for being able to "get away with it".     Two different worlds.

 

     There is something appropriate about the continuing banking and  housing mess being traceable to the Dodd-Frank Bill....perversity in morality breeding perversity in the construct of banking and housing legislation and policy.

 

     So, with these shining lights of "public service" set up as examples, we arrive upon the person of Hillary Rodham Clinton...the number one most whopperistical and narcissopotamus organism presently afflicting American culture.  She eclipses even the totally self-consumed Barak Hussein Obama.   When she asks, "What difference does it make?" in responding with exasperation to a terribly disrespectful question by some nobody of a senator or congressman....we can all have "empathy" (pointlessly overused word in these times...and appropriate for its meaninglessness) for this Great Paragon who has done so much for women and children.

     She is sitting in the same saddle that has been ridden many, many times by the corrupt, socialist cabal...filled with personal conceit, hubris, and arrogance...that states clearly, "What I have done is done.  I have gotten away with it, and there is nothing you can do about it, because you are not as important or powerful as I.  And if you oppose me I will arrange the same treatment that was rendered others...and I shall get away with those crimes as well.

      So," she can ask forcefully and melodramatically, "What difference does it make"....whether they were killed by a crowd protesting a film or just because "someone" decided to kill some Americans when he was out taking a walk (signs of delusion?)"..and  she adds, not by word but by glinting it through her "special glasses" that "....it doesn't matter what the truth is.  It only matters that I not be bothered by the truth".
       Even the expression "....out taking a walk " shows that, in her mind, she deflects the issue into some shrouded, unreal Twilight Zone of plausible impossibility...like the Wiley Coyote running in mid-air for 9 seconds before falling 3,000 feet into the Canyon, and surviving.

 

      And El Gringo Viejo responds, that he does not care, as does Hillary and Barbara Boxer and the Hillary Abortotrons, that poor Hillary has flown 1,000,000 miles for America, and has been the hardest working and best Secretary of State in American History.   For one, such bilge is both impertinent and also false posturing.  We do not care that she has flown 1,000,000 miles.   She had sufficient comfort and quarters while flying....much greater than the 99.99999% of the rest of the flying public.   Her padding....and seating and accommodation is considerable .  She travels with a stylist, secretary, butler, staff, and other slobbering sycophants, an adoring press made of abortotrons and other marxists and a limitless budget of other peoples' money.   She is not great, her accomplishments are nil in most cases, moot in others, and disastrous in several.   Arab Spring, anyone?   Thank Allah that she had a stylist on board, or she might not have looked as good as she did during most of those photo-ops, all of which were meaningless.

     As she entered the office, the world was complicated and filled with treachery.   As she is leaving, she has had no impact, save negative,  on any of it, and her "bossman" had succeeded in placing the United States into a second tier of influence to the point that the only response to an attack on a diplomatic station...probably involved in contrabanding Libyan arms to al Qaeda forces fighting Assad in Syria...was to stand by and watch.  He also succeeding in keeping the Old Bat out of Washington D.C. as much as possible.  The kept her from dominating the publicity photographs, so to speak.
        Obama did not and does not want anyone to figure out about the contrabanding.   That story is making increasing inroads in the consciousness of some, but, of course, not among the focus group low-info and low-intellect electoral base of the Democrat Party.  That contrabanding of weapons...an Arab "Fast and Furious" if the OROG please,  and the nexus with a group that most Americans know to be a remorseless, unyielding enemy, will not play well in the political market in the long run.   The American public intuitively knows that al Qaeda will take arms from us as a peace opening or offering and then kill us with those same arms.   That is another of the big reasons why Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton  do not want anyone to fully comprehend the level of insipid, arrogant, and very dangerous folly the White House embarked upon. 

 

    Saints preserve us.   A film about Islam...about muslims...a disrespectful film about Mohammed...and apology radio broadcast to Pakistan (?) and general talking points world-wide, United Nations presented case...to cover up a contrabanding operation that was doomed to go bad???    Is that why the White House had to shroud the issue and ALLOW the al Qaeda operatives in Benghazi to "eliminate the witnesses" once the issue gotten out of hand among the ever in-fighting factions of Arab Muslim extremist clics, cells, groups, and agents? 

     What else would explain the calling off of the carrier-based air response and the C-130 Spectre and/or Spook gun-ships, and other response groups who were eager to join the battle?    Where are the survivours of the Benghazi debacle, and why have they not been allowed to testify, in any way, to the Congress or the press (such as it might be)..Where?  Why?   Why were all the three star general officers in the theatre essentially detained and transferred Stateside?   Where are they?   What is their status?   Will they be dealt with as harshly as the Muslim extremist madman who murdered and wounded scores of UN-ARMED American soldiers at Fort Hood?    Or will they receive a swifter punishment.  Will they have heart attacks life Mr. JimMcDougal?  

 

Jim McDougal, died shortly
after entering prison for
involvement with crimes
in the Whitewater fiasco,
as the Clinton's partner, along
 with his wife. He had begun
 co-operating with authorities.
  Always dangerous when dealing
 with the Clintons.

      What treatment has been received by the parents of the four slain individuals from the Benghazi debacle?   Stories are surfacing that they have been subjected to all manner of governmental harassment from the Department of Justice and the IRS.   Is this just blogomania or is there something happening to them a la Mt. Carmel?   Is the dumboe who made that stupid film still in jail?   That was a high moment in American law enforcement, like Elian Gonzalez...shades of the American KGB when the Democrats have the DOJ and the FBI and the Secret Service and ATF and E and the resources of the White House's smear engines.

 Dear Madame Hillary,
 in the above three paragraphs, a common American, with little advanced strategic or even tactical military or diplomatic expertise, has painted a serious scenario of what was happening in Libya on your watch and on the tour of duty of that worthless poseur and fraud playing the role of president.   The conclusions that could and can be drawn by your predictably mendacious ....and illogical, self-contradicting testimony....coupled with your concoction of a ridiculous series of medical emergencies falling at the very moment you would be called to testify about your laziness, incompetence, self-absorption, and manoeuvring to be President of these pitifully beaten down United States....is sadly laughable.    I scoff at your lies.  I take umbrage that you would lie under oath again.  It is repulsive that you take the lives of the people you allowed to be killed so lightly, that you would let them fall so you could stand.....to preserve your "pristine" image.   Your testimony was no surprise.
    You remain a murderous, mendacious, marxist hag.  There is no health in you, your associates, your party, or your mission as it pertains to the destruction  of the unborn and of this Republic.

We retire.
El Gringo Viejo