Beware of the Mini-series Texas Rising: Balogna Alert

______________________________________________    

     It is not a good thing to warn of something that is not yet well known enough to be certain as to it ill-effect upon the culture or the understanding of history at its most accurate level possible.   It is incumbent upon this observer, however, to advise all OROGs to be especially careful about the new release on the History Channel, lamentably, under the title of "Texas Rising".

     What little this writer can glean from the trailers and other sources, scenes, and discussions about the mini-series indicates that it is a combination of literary licence, pointless lewd and lascivious depictions, and purposefully shabby historical spinning.   It is a probable fact that people during those days had sexual relations, went to the bathroom / outback, vomited, were snake-bitten, had children who died of appendicitis, married Indians, exchanged gifts on the Feast of the Nativity, and did things they wished to do, ought not to have done, and left undone things they should have done.

     Of the scenes that this writer has reviewed there are many accuracies, especially concerning firearms and uniforms or lack thereof of military personalities.  There also seems to be an over-dwelling upon the personality of Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.  There also is a misrepresentation of Lopez de Santa Anna as a gallant, sabre-pointed-towards-the-enemy front-line commander.

     He was, allow us to quickly state, not a coward, hovering behind his Praetorian Guard.  He was not stupid, but to the contrary, and lamentably, one of the upper 2% in raw and studied intelligence in North America at the time.   Quite frankly, our opinion would be that he ranked among those minds such as Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, and Franklin.

     It is well to remember that he "re-invented" himself after having been totally relegated to the dust-bin of history on several occasions.  Long after his ignominious defeat at San Jacinto in April of 1836, he later came back to take command of the Northern Army of National Defence outside of Saltillo, Coahuila to defeat the United States Army's penetration under Genls. Taylor and Worth at the Battle of Buena Vista.   While the battle may have been a draw....such as was Gettysburg....the defending army stopped the offending army, and that is a victory for the defending army.   Taylor and Worth turned their forces around and returned to police and garrison duty in Monterrey, from when they had come.
     Santa Anna, like the snake that he was, marched a huge and growing army back down to Queretaro, and stopped.  There he held 40,000 A- minus quality and supplied soldiers, and the best of the Guardia Nacional, another 30,000 well supplied and trained troops out of the fray, essentially yielding Mexico City to the Gringos.   My opinion has always been that this treasonous act was done in order to allow him to move in with strength after the cessation of hostilities, a peace treaty, and the retirement of the American military from Mexico.   At that time Antonio could move in with be best military in the south and western part of North America, and essentially take over Mexico as a permanent dictator for the subsequent 20 or 30 years.
     The Gringos stayed a little to long, and "his" army began to dissolve, leaving him essentially twisting in the wind.   So the glory of what was probably his greatest victory...the Battle of Buenavista...was left for the Gringos to tell, and they called it an American victory.  General Taylor di not call it that, to be sure, because he knew it for what it was.   It was an army too far away from supply, surrounded by a superior force that was willing to fight and that had food, powder, ammunition, mounts, etc. in sufficient supply.


     If there are scenes of Antonio Lopez order the firings squads to shoot people, they are ridiculous.  He would not dirty his hands with such.  Ordering such, yes....but serving as an execution squad sergeant?   Oh! You kid!   Much too arrogant and pretentious.
     Bill O'Reilly's Legends and Lies series about David Crockett, also left many, many things to be desired, and contained several glaring, misleading inaccuracies.   This mini-series will be even worse.   The notion that the Mexican Centralist forces came sneaking over ridges as they filtered into the precincts of San Antonio de Valero de Bexar is preposterous.    Their entry was Napoleonic....marching in good order, in best uniform and just out of distance of the best known artillery held by the Defenders.


     The dwelling upon a certain woman by the name of Emily (are they referring to Emily Morgan or to the Yellow Rose?) West.   She is the person depicted as the main squeeze of Antonio Lopez, and the perhaps the mini-series will depict her as a "heroine" who gave up her virtue to as to distract Lopez de Santa Anna from the impending  attack at full-force of the Texian Army.   Such is preposterous on the face of it, due to the fact that Emily could not ever have known of the day, hour, minute, and/or second of the attack so as to co-ordinate said event with any type of conjugality.

Building and grounds of the Institute of Texian Cultures
Outside fly the banners of the 28 nations whose ethnicities
are most represented in the cultural fabric of the Republic
of Texas.

     Much of that repetitious bilge was fostered by an old boss of El Gringo Viejo, when he served under the supervision of the blustery, bologna-vendor J. Henderson Shuffler.  I was a field researcher of the Institute of Texian Cultures when the anthro-historical museum was being built in preparation for San Antonio's and Texas's HemiFair - 1968.   The museum still lives in the centre of San Antonio, equidistant from where the San Antonio Spurs play their home games and the Alamo.   Shuffler, in academic terms, was a shallow-plough farmer who delighted in learning and re-telling off-coloured tales and stories (jokes) involving Negroes.  There are others tales to tell about Shuffler, but they are better left to the wind to nowhere.
    He was a favourite of another coarse jackass by the name of Lyndon Baines Johnson who happened to be President of the United States of America at that time, successfully being elected in 1964 by campaigning against Barry Goldwater, and promising that for so long as he would be President no American boy would be sent to fight in a land war in Asia.   Shuffler threw me out of his office one morning because I suggested that a display about the stern-mounted paddle wheelers of the Rio Grande could be an interesting display because the founder of the King Ranch came from Brooklyn and wound up being Texas's biggest cattle and land baron for a good while.  He grumbled that he had never heard of such stupid BS and ordered me to the door.   He was, of course, wrong....but I was 19, and he was 327 years old.


     In any regard, he and various others promulgated the false legend of Emily West Morgan.   First and foremost, there is between none and less evidence that she had anything to do with Antonio Lopez.

    "But, but Gringo Viejo, how can you say such a stupid thing?  Everybody knows that Emily was always shacking up with Antonio all the time.   She was a slave trying to connive her way to emancipation, everybody knows that....and she had a big affair with Jim Bowie, too....I saw it in a movie one time."

     Well, not so much.   (1) There were various Mexican officers of record who were there, very near or within the distance of having reasonable first-hand knowledge of very intimate details about Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.   They wrote about and complained about his continual use of cocaine and aged wine in copious amounts.  They hated him almost to a man.  None made mention of this supposed "relationship" between Lopez de Santa Anna and Emily West.  (2)   There were some observations that he had a proclivity towards very, very young girls...not old ladies of 24 - 27 years of age, like Emily.   Lopez de Santa Anna's last wife was taken, from a good family in Vera Cruz, at the age of 15 when Antonio was nearing 40. (3)   In the account by Jose Enrique de la Pen~a, Lieutenant Colonel, 1st Zapper Battalion, Army of the United States of Mexico....possibly the first commissioned officers through the walls of the Alamo, there is no mention of Lopez de Santa Anna's interloping with Emily West.  (4)    Depicting such congress in and/or around San Antonio, as is frequently done, is ridiculous on the face of the matter because Emily never ventured far from the area around Galveston, Washington on the Brazos, to the Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, and Harrisburg area.   (5)  In many accounts, some formally given in military legal processes, no mention was made about Emily West by officers who hated, despised, and  wished ill upon Lopez de Santa Anna.  (6)   Miss Emily West was the charge of a fellow from New York, and came to Texas under his sponsorship while in the company of Mrs. Lorenzo de Zavala, Vice-President of Texas and one of the cornerstone Texian Heroes.  These were very staid and correct people, and even Antonio Lopez would have been careful with such prisoners.   He was never known to have personally availed himself of people of such class and connection and gender.  Emily was born a free woman, not a slave as some say, and she was brought to Texas as a governess or formal nanny and moved comfortably among people of the social strata of Mrs. de Zavala. (6)  The surname "Morgan" was added on not by marriage.  This usually was done parenthetically, to women who had a ward or sponsor....no one  ever made mention, at least to be historically recorded that Emily was a mistress in the modern sense, a concubine of any kind, or a woman of convenience for Mr. Morgan or Mr. Anyone.  (7)   She returned under the eye and supervision of the very young widow of Lorenzo de Zavala who died very young (47 years of age) after fighting off a return of malaria, and then the effects of a fall into Buffalo Bayou during a cold period in the latter part of 1836.  He developed pneumonia and, after building the foundation of the Republic of Texas, expired....stunning the new Republic.


     My burden is knowing too much that no longer makes any difference.  But our cultural, economic, historical, and political ignorance, I fear, will cause the final collapse of the American Republic.   Failing to know the history of important episodes and matters cause folks to devalue such history and relegate that history to an obscure corner to rot in the darkness.   Mini-series that round the corners and colour orange into blue and put high mountains into areas like San Antonio and Houston....do disservice to one and all.


More later.
El Gringo Viejo

__________________________________________________

Sunset Grill

Susan Sarandon proves that all progressives are liars

_______________________________________________

 

    

     We happened to see Susannah Sarandon for a few seconds before being able to find the channel selector.   She was carefully explaining to the show host, another  progresso-drooler, how Ronald Reagan caused homelessness to arrive on American Shores by emphasising the notion of rugged individualism.   Along with that emphasis, Reagan let it be known that if a person were to hit a rough patch it was because of his own moral and psychological inadequacy.  This policy on the part of Ronald Reagan began in 1981 or 1982, she was not clear which year.

     Therefore, to set the record straight, and as part of my own self-inflated notion of importance, El Gringo Viejo forwards this message to the very loopy diva of illogic and cluelessness.

        Dear Miss Susannah Sarandon -  During the latter half of the 1970s, in keeping with the American Progressive Movement's  overall objective to tear down the communitarian, traditionalist American landscape and force it into third-world conditions found in 93% of the remainder of Planet Earth, repeated efforts were made to release all the kooky-bongos from the asylums.
     This is not a joke.  It was true that there were a few people who had been railroaded into the psychiatric clinics and hospitals.  It was also true that very few of those places were what might be considered a Sandals on the Beach somewhere in the Bahamas, or at least South Padre Island of Texas.

     The problem was that many of the people who were interned  at psychiatric facilities, frequently under judicial order, actually needed to be where they wound up....under supervision, without any guns, sharp instruments, glass bottles, or access to drugs and/or alcohol.

Some women age well and

 some hags age like

 (Sir Edmund)

 Hillary. 

     After repeated assaults against this reprehensible condition affecting the kooky-bongo  community there were finally enough dullard, anti-American judges who decided that kooky-bongo people needed love too, and that the Constitution has it clearly printed in Article XXXVII of the 43rd Amendment that ".....no kooky-bongo, notwithstanding his level of kooky-bongoness, shall be forced to remain apart from the general community unless it can be demonstrably demonstrated that the kooky-bongo of the first part presents a clear and present danger to himself or another kooky-bongo(s), or to a member of the general community, except in the States of New York and California where everyone is kooky bongo, and therefore, under the intermutual exclusionary clause of 1848, can neither be excluded nor included in any or all of the foregoing."    WHEW!
     (We would like to point out that these are the same type of ACLU allied judges who somehow find that the Ku Klux Klan has the "right" to demonstrate without first officially repudiating any mention in their charter about the elimination of Jews, Negroes, Catholics, and atheists.   So long as anyone swears allegiance to these objectives, their presence constitutes a continuing shouting of "fire!" in the crowded, darkened theatre.  The Constitution requires that Congrefs shall make no law restricting free speech....it does not prohibit locales from doing so, nor does it restrict States in their wisdom to do so.)

     And the gates were opened.   Marginally competent people who did not know what century it was or what planet they were riding, were allowed to leave the "facility".  After all, what could go wrong?  It was something similar, and simultaneous,  to homosexuals learning that they could take over the bathhouses, and the heroine addicts learned that they could share needles.   Heck, after 1,200 sexual contacts in a year or shooting up with 30 different needles who were shared with what's-his-name (or was it her name?) what could possibly go wrong?    The cultural junkyard cum Hiroshima soon followed.

     And....according to Sarandon, it was all Reagan's fault.   In truth, El Gringo Viejo never saw Ronald Reagan walking around in front of a "bathhouse" in San Francisco with a sandwich board saying "Welcome, free steamers, towels, friends".  We never saw  Nancy Reagan who was supposedly seen frequently in male-drag, offering heroin addicts hypodermics that she had recovered from Dempster Dumpsters.   We know it must have happened because Susannah Sarandon said so, and she is, after all, an actress.   I mean, if she doesn't know things, who does?

    We have to leave, because we have been giving all of our loose change to the Sandra Fluke Birth Control Pill Charity so that she can avoid having to spend 3,500 dollars a year for her birth control pills. It's the time we normally send our loose change to her.  We also sent her a map showing various CVCs, Wal-Marts, Walgreens, and other popular and accessible places that sell the same pills for what would amount to less that 360 dollars per year....but we never heard back from her.

More later.   We are humbled by the back-count on our circulation.  We are expecting the Men in Black to arrive at any time.
El Gringo Viejo

_____________________________________________

The Beatles - Nowhere Man

Vile Hubris - Portrait of perfect hatred for good and beauty

____________________________________________________

 

 

     Anyone long-associated with the Rodham - Clinton Axis from Hell must be ugly outside, ugly inside, or preferably, ugly inside and out.   The perfect model, of course, would be the craggy, frumpy, hideous black-hearted, murderous, marxist, mendacious hag known as (Sir Edmund) Hillary Rodham Clinton.

 

     While the press goes into the feeding frenzy of sparrows finding a box of oatmeal over whether or not Jeb Bush knew the middle name of Crazy Harold Horse of if Ted Cruz can sing La Cucaracha whether it pertains to Cuba or America or not there are other matters of particular weight.   Life and Death weight.   Who did it weight?

 

   Read what follows and ask, "It could not possibly be that someone would arrange for the deaths of an entire plane-load of people just to keep from going to prison for four or five years?"   But consider that you are Sir Arthur Conan Doyle or Earl Stanley Gardner or  Agatha Christi....could you write the book with the ingredients to be listed below?   To wit:

 

Share this:

• Facebook2K+
• Twitter1K+
• Google

• Email

Hillary’s closest adviser is hiding the truth of her emails

By Paul Sperry

View author archive

Adviser Cheryl Mills knows all of Clinton's secrets

 — and hides them.

                         Photo: AP/Getty Images

____________________________________

     If Congress really wants to get to the bottom of Hillary Clinton’s missing Benghazi and pay-to-play emails, it should call her consigliere Cheryl D. Mills to testify — under oath, and under the klieg lights.

A hearing featuring Clinton will be a wasted show trial with a lot of political grandstanding.

But Mills, who served as the former secretary of state’s chief of staff and counselor, knows where the bodies are buried. After all, Hillary tasked her with “identifying and preserving all emails that could potentially be federal records.”

And, presumably, deleting.

Mills has a long track record of hiding Clinton documents.

Since the 1990s, Mills has been at Hillary’s side — first as a White House lawyer, then as her closest and most loyal adviser at the State Department, and now as a key member of the Clinton Foundation board, which is under fire for raking in hundreds of millions of dollars from dubious foreign sources in alleged influence-peddling deals.

      The job of damage control has fallen to Mills through a parade of scandals. Her lack of cooperation is legendary. In fact, she’s been officially accused of both perjury and obstruction of justice.

Sworn affidavits, depositions and court rulings, as well as congressional reports and testimony, paint a picture of, to put it charitably, a brazenly dishonest cover-up specialist.

 

Among her shenanigans:

• 
  As White House deputy counsel, Mills ordered Commerce Department officials to “withhold” from investigators emails and other documents detailing then-President Bill Clinton’s and first lady Hillary Clinton’s allegedly illegal selling of seats on foreign trade junkets for campaign cash, according to sworn statements by Commerce’s former FOIA chief. “Ms. Mills, in her position as deputy counsel to the president, advised Commerce officials to withhold certain documents,” testified Sonya Stewart Gilliam in a July 2000 sworn affidavit taken by Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group in Washington. “The Commerce Department’s collaboration with White House Deputy Counsel Mills on these matters was, in my experience, highly irregular and at variance with normal procedures.
• 
  
  

  • At the same time, a federal judge ruled that Mills “failed miserably” to take proper steps to search for and recover 1.8 million Executive Office of the President and Office of the First Lady emails under subpoena in the Monica Lewinsky and Filegate scandal investigations, after computer contractors discovered them mysteriously missing from the automated White House archiving system. Mills, who was in charge of finding the lost email, conveniently made “the most critical error” in recovering them, US District Judge Royce Lamberth concluded in a 63-page opinion, adding that he found her actions “loathsome.” In fact, Judicial Watch accused Mills of orchestrating a “cover-up” in what became known as “Email-gate.” Her court testimony in the case, during which she repeatedly answered “I don’t have a recollection,” sounds like an interview with an amnesia patient. (In the end, the emails were never recovered.)

  
  

  • In another scandal, Mills “concealed” so many subpoenaed emails and other documents detailing allegedly illegal fundraising activity between the White House and the Democratic National Committee — specifically, Hillary’s illegal integration of White House and DNC computer databases — that staff lawyers for the House Government Oversight Committee in 1998 sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department demanding federal prosecutors charge Mills with obstruction of justice and perjury. “Ms. Mills knowingly and willfully obstructed the investigative authority of this committee by withholding documents,” the panel concluded in a 647-page investigative report. “Moreover, when this obstruction was brought to light in a hearing before the committee, Ms. Mills lied under oath about the documents and the circumstances surrounding their nonproduction.”

  
  

  • In October 2012, Mills sorted through key Benghazi documents and decided which ones to withhold from an independent review board. She also leaned on witnessses. Deputy ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks testified before Congress in 2013 that Mills told him in an angry phone call to stop cooperating with investigators.

  
  

  • On behalf of the Clintons, Mills negotiated the weak conflict-of-interest rules for disclosing foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation with the Obama administration. She also reportedly helped broker international payments to the group.

       In short, Mills “is in the middle of it,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.   An investigator with the House Select Committee on Benghazi said if the panel calls Mills as a witness, her testimony will most likely be taken behind closed doors in a “transcribed interview.” That would be a mistake.   Mills should be sworn in and grilled in a public hearing in front of TV cameras.    Sweating Mills could crack the case wide open.
•  Otherwise, Hillary could walk away unscathed, waltz right back into the White House — and Mills could end up running it as chief of staff.
• 
  Paul Sperry is author of “The Great American Bank Robbery” and co-producer of the forthcoming documentary “Subprime 2.0,” which exposes the Clintons’ role in the mortgage crisis.  All credit in the above post has been noted, overall credit is given to the New York Post.

______________________________________________

 

Here, AlGore tries to comfort another girl

who has been assaulted by Bill and then

threatened by (Sir Edmund) Hillary in the

White House Rose Garden.  The barrel

upon which the girl is sitting has over two

million dollars in checks and cash, marked

'made in China'  Those were the days.

 

     It is further known that Billy Jeff and AlGore used their physical offices and accoutrements to raise money and conduct affairs for various personal and political purposes.   There was the famous clip of Billy Jeff hustling some big-wig business people who were in training for their crony-capitalist badges in the Hitlerkinderorganisirien IN THE WEST WING OF THE WHITE HOUSE!

    And, of course, internationally famous snow-producer and shamster AlGore did not know that the Buddhist Monks in Los Angeles were not really Monks but rather Red Chinese operatives co-opting the President and Vice-President with gifts of cash and checks.

     Like good ole' Al said, he is just a country boy who grew up a'plowin' on the steep sides of them there rocky Tennessee hills, plantin', and a'plowin' them there tabakki plants behind a pair o' big ole Missouri mules.

   So he weren't no ways tired when it came time to take them there grocery bags back to the White House.  Why hecks fire....he'd a'done it a milyun times before when he was workin' for Old Man Jake Raskin at his genral store.   You all know...don-cha?   Them there brown paper bags that you can fold back up if yer reel careful.

     And the beat went on.  As the number of stupid, low-information voters (Grubers words, not mine) and ignorant, low information voters  (Geitner's word's, not mine) and habitual drooler-Democrat voters (prima facia evidence abounds) continued to be placated, and the Republicans became increasingly afraid of their own shadows.
 

    Things such as a plane-load of crony capitalists who had paid their Dane-geld-way onto a junket arranged by Ron Brown, Secretary of Commerce....who had just agreed to "go state" like his mentor, some power woman lobbyist in D.C., against the Clintons....well that plane just happened to make a one-point landing on a mountainside in the Balkans, just after take-off.   On a clear day....when everything was shrouded in fog, and when later two different air traffic controllers committed suicide not long afterwards.   ????? 

     Maggie Thompson, Cheryl Mills, Susan Elizabeth Rice...expert in videography pertaining to Mohammed-themed treatises, Bernie Nausbaum, Sydney Blumenthal, of course Sir Edmund's body man Huma Weiner.....(tee-hee), and all the strangely shaped and wired wierdos, flakes, crooks, bums, and narcissistic know-nothings who consider themselves to be the enlightened intelligencia of all epochs.....they are all just like (Sir Edmund)Hillary's brothers and "hubbie".....nowhere men and nowhere women, using the term men and women loosely.

 

 

_____________________________________________

 

 

El Gringo Viejo

This would serve to impeach and convict anyone....but people are aftaid of the Clintons....scared to death.....probably even Trey Gowdy

_____________________________________________

    The flap over the continuing sleaze and corruption for which anything Clinton, Rodham, or Democrat Party must be credited presents new and exciting opportunities for people who like to put septic and bubonic material under the focus of their microscopes.   Gorgeous Georgie Stephanopoulos swishes forth with an endearing commentary about what kind of saint his is.   Just think of all that money he gave in the fight against Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

     Little difference does it make, Stephie, that you could have given money directly to the Docteurs Sans Frontieres and the money would have been used at a 96 to 99 per cent level of efficiency and a 100 per cent level of effectiveness.   Those percentages are a little better than 10 - 12 per cent chalked up by the Clinton Criminal Conspiracy Programme (CCCP).

 

     There is a bit of an override expense in trying to keep (Sir Edmund) Hillary's large.....uh....interest in her brother's well-being up to standards.  The CCCP's "assistance" to Haiti did include a sweetheart gold mining concession to (Sir Edmund) Hillary's whitetrash, vagabond, bag-man brother prompting this assessment....one of several long, long summaries of rousing failures and legal spider-webs covered somewhat accurately even by Wikipedia....To wit:
 

"Following the 2010 Haiti earthquake and with Bill Clinton co-chair of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission, Rodham and some partners proposed a $22 million deal to rebuild homes in the devastated nation, with funding to come from the Clinton Foundation.^[5] The deal never went forward and the Clinton Foundation said it was unaware of the proposal.^[5] In October 2013, Rodham joined the advisory board of VCS Mining, a Delaware-based company that was planning a gold mine in the Cap-Haïtien Arrondissement area of Haiti.^[28] By 2015 the project had become controversial due to possible environmental effects and the level of foreign ownership; for his part Rodham objected to any inference that he had gotten this position due to his family: 'I'm a very accomplished person in my own right. I raise money for a lot of people. That's what I basically do.'"^[28]

 

     ^{And yes, El Gringo Viejo knows that the Rodham brothers are guilty of scores of other crimes and misdemeanours, some much more egregious, such as assisting and facilitating the sale of Presidential Pardons....for money of all things!!  Can you imagine?  But, what possible difference can any of this make at this point?} 

^{_______________________________________________________}

George Stephanopoulos Did More Than Just Give Money To The Clinton Foundation

Matt Vespa | May 17, 2015

       Earlier this week, Guy wrote about ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos giving $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation, a fact he failed to disclose when reporting on the former First Family and their non-profit organization. He has since apologized for his lack of transparency (via Ed Morrissey):

I want to address some news you may have seen about me. Over the last several years, I’ve made substantial donations to dozens of charities, including the Clinton Global Foundation. Those donations were a matter of public record, but I should have made additional disclosures on air when we covered the foundation. And I now believe that directing personal donations to that foundation was a mistake. Even though I made them strictly to support work done to stop the spread of AIDS, help children, and protect the environment in poor countries, I should have gone the extra mile to avoid even the appearance of a conflict. I apologize to all of you for failing to do that.



 

Yet, as Ed noted, Stephanopoulos’ donations were public insofar as they’re listed on the Clinton Foundation’s tax returns; returns that have transparency problems of its own. Regardless, this revelation makes it all the more delicious given that Stephanopoulos accused Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, of having a conflict of interest due to his political leanings when he interviewed him on This Week in April.

Well, Schweizer recently reported that Stephanopoulos hasn’t been fully forthcoming about his ties to the Clinton Foundation, which goes beyond paychecks. He’s been a featured attendee and a panel moderator at past annual meetings for the Clinton Global Initiative (via USA Today):

…his [Stephanopulos] on air apology for this ethical mess, Stephanopoulos did not disclose that in 2006 he was a featured attendee and panel moderator at the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).

He did not disclose that in 2007, he was a featured attendee at the CGI annual meeting, a gathering also attended by several individuals I report on in Clinton Cash, including mega Clinton Foundation donors Lucas Lundin, Frank Giustra, Frank Holmes, and Carlos Slim — individuals whose involvement with the Clintons I assumed he had invited me on his program to discuss.

Stephanopoulos did not disclose that he was a 2008 panelist at the CGI annual meeting which, once again, featured individuals I report on in the book, such as billionaire Clinton Foundation foreign donor Denis O'Brien.

ABC's most visible news employee did not disclose that in 2009, he served as a panel moderator at CGI's annual meeting, nor did he disclose that in 2010 and 2011, he was an official CGI member.

Stephanopoulos did not disclose that in 2013 and 2014, he and Chelsea Clinton served as CGI contest judges for awards, in part, underwritten by Laureate International Universities — a for-profit education company I report on in the book. Bill Clinton was on its payroll until his recent resignation.

Schweizer wrote that ABC News virtually ignored his inquiries into why this information has yet to be made public to ABC viewers.  Instead, they told him, "Yes, George made us aware that he was moderating these panels and that is absolutely within our guidelines. We know that he would be listed as a member — as all moderators are. He is in good company of scores of other journalists that have moderated these panels."

Oh, and how ABC News handled the Stephanopoulos donation revelation is another story by itself. Apparently, the Washington Free Beacon discovered the donation, contacted ABC, who then went to Politico’s Dylan Byers–all after they promised to get back to them with a comment (via WaPo):

[Matthew] Continetti is the editor-in-chief of the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website that launched in February 2012. Stiles is the digital managing editor for the Washington Free Beacon. The Stephanopoulos story surfaced on Wednesday just before 3:30 p.m., when Stiles found his name on the Clinton Foundation’s donor lists. He e-mailed Continetti, who told him to move on the story and also directed a researcher to check whether Stephanopoulos had seeded any of his on-air work with disclosures about the donations.

The research turned up no evidence of Stephanopoulos having told viewers of his largesse to the Clinton Foundation, clinching the need for a story. “I think you have to write this one straight,” Continetti wrote to Stiles, who sometimes takes attitudinal approaches to the news. The editor-in-chief also cited the need for a comment from Stephanopoulos’s office. “I knew immediately that this was a news story,” says Continetti.

Despite Stiles’ best efforts, ABC News didn’t cough up a response on the spot. Heather Riley, a spokeswoman for ABC News, e-mailed Stiles just after 9 p.m., promising him “something.” “What time are you posting? Want to make sure I get it to you in time,” she wrote.

Hear this, knee-jerk detractors of modern web journalism: Absent a comment from ABC News, Continetti & Co. decided to let the matter sit overnight. They just waited.

When the Washington Free Beaconers put their heads together Thursday morning, there was still no comment from ABC News. “I say, ‘Let’s begin to move this story,'” recalls Continetti. The piece wasn’t complicated: A network news anchor had contributed to a charity run by the first family of the Democratic party and hadn’t told viewers when that charity emerged in news coverage. What was complicated was its landing. “Literally as we were about to hit ‘post,’ we are alerted to the Dylan Byers piece that just went up,” says Continetti, who moved to publish their piece without the ABC News statements. Those arrived later.

The Post’s Erik Wemple said it is possible that Byers found out about the donations at the same time, though we can only speculate since he told them he couldn’t comment on sourcing. Wemple wrote that ABC News has to explain the torpor that overcame them when responding to the Free Beacon’s request for a comment.

If indeed ABC News “ran” to Byers after getting an inquiry from the Washington Free Beacon, shame on them. PR shops, after all, exist to handle just the scenario that the Washington Free Beacon presented. It’s a very linear transaction: Reporter asks, PR responds. Should it turn out that ABC News betrayed this very simplicity, the network will have forfeited its expectation that journalists check with them before publishing their goods on ABC News. “I’m trying to instill the value of reporting to a new generation of conservative reporters,” says Continetti. “What lesson do they draw when they do their due diligence and some hack PR agent goes to another outlet in order to control the story?”

That’s such a good question that the Erik Wemple Blog just dropped it into an e-mail and passed it along to ABC News along with the other questions that they won’t answer.

…

Silence is unacceptable here. ABC News has to do one of two things: Either apologize to the Washington Free Beacon for whatever precisely it did or explain how its actions meet the commonly acknowledged standards of the industry.

(article source:  Townhall Newsletter)

 

__________________________________________________________

    We must point out that Stephie Stephanopoulos grilled the author of Clinton Cash....the book that recounts (Sir Edmund) Hillary's and Billy Jeff Blyth's Sharpton-style pre-paid blackmail, self-enrichment programme, the Clinton Criminal Conspiracy Programme.  Said programme is a shakedown, protected by narcissistic fools who can pose questions such as "But how can anyone believe any of this when everybody knows that you are a Republican who simply wants to hatchet-job any prominent Democrat?"  Classical question posed by a fool, who is an arrogant fool, and an arrogant fool who has no sense of pride or shame.   And ye shall know them by their good works.

    Their good works?   A complete Democrat Slave Houseboy asking Romney why he wanted to take away birth control medicines and devices from women.   Accusing the Pot of being black when the Kettle is blacker.  It's nice to be a leftist, because it means...even at Chappaquiddick Bridge, never having to say, "I'm sorry."   After all, George Bush did nothing to repair that old bridge. 

     The reason El Gringo Viejo is bald is because he has almost 100 year's-worth of head scratching trying to make sense of almost anything Democrats, liberals, progressives, marxists, anti-traditionalists, socialists, and communists say.   It all seems to go into the ever overflowing Dempster Dumpster in the Sky where one finds things like, "....we'll just have to vote for it to find out what's inside of it."

 

More later.  We have many arrows filling many quivers.  My house is made of adobe and not glass.  Read the comments of El Zorro, check out the Anglican Curmudgeon, review the submissions of our contributors, check out TownHall and other reviews....and keep an eye on Politico...the only remotely sane pinko news-source.

 

El Gringo Viejo

____________________________________________________