_____________________
This should be a happily brief note to the OROG community and the other followers who seem to be bunched up in the northeastern part of the United States and western Europe, and to some extent in Japan and South Korea. Odd. Perhaps I should send some advisories to Australia and and New Zealand about our radical policies.
We have been increasingly concerned about the new head of the Department of Defense, a fellow by the name of General Lloyd T. Austin III, recently confirmed to his office after being named by President Biden. Normally, these matters come and go…perfunctory things that require procedure and process.
Lt. Gen. (retired) Lloyd T. Austin, III Secretary of Defence United States of America _______________________________ |
This time, however, we have had that unwanted unease that suggests something is amiss. It is sort of a cat's intuition when there has been no sound…or a dog, asleep, suddenly opens his eyes, but does not move…as he sniffs something that interrupted his sleep. The brief advisory to Lieutenant General (retired) Lloyd T. Austin, III by the President and his people was a classic demonstration of how a hand and a glove can fit so well at the first fitting.
To wit: The following paragraph can provide some guidance to the things to come from the Department of Defense. For so long as imbeciles such as the present holder of the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America and his cadre hold sway in of the rudder of the Ship of State, we must expect the worst in our construct, deployment, and application of our military.
Shaken by concerns of possible right-wing radicalism among the troops, incoming Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on February 5th announced that every single unit of the United States military; Active, Reserve, and Guard would be required to stand down within the next 60 days in order to conduct sensitivity training. The training will last at least one day and will be focused around discussions including the importance of the oath of office; a description of impermissible behaviors; and procedures for reporting suspected, or actual, extremist behaviors.[67][68][69][70][71][72
We are not actually stretching a point, because there are several analysts, observer, and interested parties mixed up into this matter. Your humble servant tends to minimise but not ignore a peculiar characteristic about the good General's service. To be sure, on the surface, the General is a man of almost constant service up until a few years ago. In a way, his image is made bright and positive because of that length of service and the attaining of the rank of Lt. General…which is about as high as a soldier can go.
There were very, very few who ever attained the rank of five-star general. My recollection calls out this group for muster:
(1) General Henry H. Arnold
(2) General Omar Bradley
(3) General Dwight David Eisenhower
(4) Admiral William Halsey, Jr.
(5) Admiral Ernest King
(6) Admiral William Leahy
(7) General Douglas MacAurthur
(8) General George Marshall
(9) Admiral Chester Nimitz
Three men were endowed with honourable five-star status based upon their
service before the rank had been recognised or even proposed. They are:
(a) Admiral George Dewey
(b) General George (Black Jack) Patton
(c) General George Washington
My sense is very much that the Good General (retired) Lloyd T. Austin will be at the ready to assure that all left-handed albatrosses who wear ballet outfits when they are pregnant will be given adequate lectures about not discussing any positive material concerning Robert Edward Lee, and that homosexual, reverse re-transgendered bionogribsticklers are given first positions in the lo-cal, non-fattening, dietetically correct cellophane December Holidays turkey-vinyl, food-like substance celebration. Remember…no names or assignment of purpose for "Holidays" of any kind.
The idea of having a celebration with holes punched in it should be repugnant to all.
We are in for a ride, folks.
EL GRINGO VIEJO…
_____________________